Glossary · Safety and alignment

What is Sycophancy?

Sycophancy is a safety or alignment concept in AI systems. It is part of the vocabulary teams use when they compare models, design prompts or review an AI system.

Definition

Sycophancy is a safety or alignment concept in AI systems. It is part of the vocabulary teams use when they compare models, design prompts or review an AI system. The term is used in safety and alignment discussions, where precision matters: two teams can use the same word to mean slightly different things. In this glossary, sycophancy is treated as a practical concept rather than a formal specification.

Why it matters

Safety terms describe how systems are constrained, monitored and evaluated for harmful or unintended behaviour. They matter because a model that performs well on benchmarks can still fail badly in an open-ended deployment.

Example

Suppose you are comparing Llama 3.3 Groq 7B with another model for a production task. Sycophancy is one of the factors behind the numbers you see: Llama 3.3 Groq 7B lists a 16,384-token context window, costs $1.01 per million input tokens and scores 70.5 on HellaSwag. Understanding the term helps you decide which of those differences actually matter for your workload.

How to evaluate it

  • Check whether sycophancy is defined the same way in the documentation you are reading.
  • Ask which measurement or trade-off the term is describing before comparing numbers.
  • Separate vendor claims from independently observed behaviour on your own data.
  • Write down the definition your team uses so reviews and evaluations stay consistent.

Related terms

Related guides

FAQ

What does Sycophancy mean?

Sycophancy is a safety or alignment concept in AI systems. It is part of the vocabulary teams use when they compare models, design prompts or review an AI system.

Why does Sycophancy matter?

Safety terms describe how systems are constrained, monitored and evaluated for harmful or unintended behaviour. They matter because a model that performs well on benchmarks can still fail badly in an open-ended deployment.

How is Sycophancy used in practice?

Suppose you are comparing Llama 3.3 Groq 7B with another model for a production task. Sycophancy is one of the factors behind the numbers you see: Llama 3.3 Groq 7B lists a 16,384-token context window, costs $1.01 per million input tokens and scores 70.5 on HellaSwag. Understanding the term helps you decide which of those differences actually matter for your workload.