IFEval: scores, leaders and methodology
IFEval leaderboard data from the index. Verifiable instruction-following tasks with programmatic checks. The top score is 96.1 and the average is 78.6.
What the data shows
Claude Opus 4.5 Pro leads at 96.1. The gap to the average is 17.5 points, and the gap to the 10th-ranked model is 1.6 points.
The median score is 81.2. Models above that line are in the upper half of the index for this benchmark.
How to read the ranking
- Use the score to shortlist, not to declare a winner.
- Check price and context for the top candidates.
- Read the benchmark methodology before quoting a score.
- Pair this benchmark with a task-specific evaluation.
Top 20 on IFEval
| # | Model | Provider | Score | Input / 1M | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 4.5 Pro | Anthropic | 96.1 | $20.98 | 200,000 |
| 2 | Claude Opus 4.5 Reasoning | Anthropic | 95.9 | $20.91 | 2,000,000 |
| 3 | GPT-5.2 Pro | OpenAI | 95.6 | $21.32 | 2,000,000 |
| 4 | GPT-5.2 Max | OpenAI | 95.2 | $21.39 | 1,000,000 |
| 5 | GPT-5.2 Reasoning | OpenAI | 95.0 | $20.98 | 1,000,000 |
| 6 | GPT-5.1 Pro | OpenAI | 94.8 | $19.77 | 200,000 |
| 7 | Gemini 3 Pro Max | Google DeepMind | 94.7 | $20.57 | 2,000,000 |
| 8 | GPT-5.1 Reasoning | OpenAI | 94.6 | $20.27 | 400,000 |
| 9 | Claude Opus 4.5 Max | Anthropic | 94.5 | $20.90 | 1,000,000 |
| 10 | o4 Reasoning | OpenAI | 94.5 | $19.69 | 1,000,000 |
| 11 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Pro | Anthropic | 94.1 | $18.73 | 1,000,000 |
| 12 | GPT-5.2 Vision | OpenAI | 93.9 | $19.03 | 1,000,000 |
| 13 | Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning | Google DeepMind | 93.8 | $19.69 | 200,000 |
| 14 | Gemini 3 Pro | Google DeepMind | 93.7 | $18.24 | 2,000,000 |
| 15 | Qwen3-Max Max | Alibaba Cloud | 93.7 | $18.53 | 400,000 |
| 16 | GPT-5.2 | OpenAI | 93.6 | $19.71 | 2,000,000 |
| 17 | GPT-5.1 Turbo | OpenAI | 93.4 | $19.19 | 2,000,000 |
| 18 | Gemini 3 Pro Turbo | Google DeepMind | 93.4 | $19.62 | 400,000 |
| 19 | Grok 4 Reasoning | xAI | 93.4 | $19.67 | 2,000,000 |
| 20 | Qwen3-Max Pro | Alibaba Cloud | 93.2 | $18.87 | 400,000 |
Methodology
This story uses the AI & LLM Index dataset: 600 models, 40 providers and 12 benchmarks. Prices are listed per million tokens. Scores are modelled estimates on a 0–100 scale and are not official benchmark results. Figures are rounded for readability.
Related
FAQ
What does the IFEval: scores, leaders and methodology data show?
IFEval leaderboard data from the index. Verifiable instruction-following tasks with programmatic checks. The top score is 96.1 and the average is 78.6.
Are the numbers official?
No. Prices and scores are compiled for this demo index. Benchmark values are modelled estimates, not official results. Verify figures with the provider or benchmark owner before making decisions.
How should I use this ranking?
Use it to form a shortlist. Check the specific model pages, compare price and context, and test the shortlist on your own examples before committing.