Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max vs Grok 3 Pro: which model should you choose?

We compared Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max and Grok 3 Pro on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Grok 3 Pro has the stronger average benchmark score; Grok 3 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Anthropic

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max is a frontier model from Anthropic. It offers a 128,000-token context window, costs $16.88 per million input tokens and $83.20 per million output tokens, and averages 83.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.88 / 1M
Output
$83.20 / 1M
Context
128,000
Avg score
83.7
Open weights
No
Full Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max page
xAI

Grok 3 Pro

Grok 3 Pro is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $16.61 per million input tokens and $73.49 per million output tokens, and averages 83.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.61 / 1M
Output
$73.49 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
83.8
Open weights
No
Full Grok 3 Pro page

Specification comparison

SpecClaude 3.7 Sonnet MaxGrok 3 ProEdge
Input price / 1M$16.88$16.61B
Output price / 1M$83.20$73.49B
Context window128,000400,000B
Max output32,7684,096A
Average score83.783.8B
Arena Elo1461.61448.4A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max wins 8, Grok 3 Pro wins 4, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkClaude 3.7 Sonnet MaxGrok 3 ProGapWinner
MMLU-Pro86.083.52.5Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max
GPQA Diamond76.881.34.5Grok 3 Pro
SWE-bench Verified76.171.44.7Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max
HumanEval90.989.91.0Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max
MATH-50087.287.00.2Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max
AIME 202580.785.54.8Grok 3 Pro
LiveCodeBench78.180.72.6Grok 3 Pro
IFEval90.088.61.4Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max
TruthfulQA84.784.60.1Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max
HellaSwag91.290.70.5Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max
MMMU78.878.90.1Grok 3 Pro
Arena Elo1461.61448.413.2Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max costs about $33.46 per million tokens and Grok 3 Pro costs about $30.83. Grok 3 Pro is roughly 8% cheaper than Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Grok 3 Pro has the larger context window at 400,000 tokens, compared with 128,000 for Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max wins 8, Grok 3 Pro wins 4, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Grok 3 Pro leads Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max by 0.1 points (83.8 versus 83.7).

The price picture favours Grok 3 Pro. The context picture favours Grok 3 Pro. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Grok 3 Pro for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max if

  • You need the larger 32,768-token output limit.

Choose Grok 3 Pro if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 400,000-token context window.

FAQ

Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max better than Grok 3 Pro?

On the index average, Grok 3 Pro leads Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max by 0.1 points (83.8 versus 83.7). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max wins 8 benchmarks, Grok 3 Pro wins 4.

Which is cheaper, Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max or Grok 3 Pro?

Grok 3 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $30.83 per million tokens, versus $33.46 for Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max.

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 3 Pro has the larger context window at 400,000 tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max has 128,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max is proprietary; Grok 3 Pro is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Grok 3 Pro for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons