Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max vs o3 Turbo: which model should you choose?

We compared Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max and o3 Turbo on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max has the stronger average benchmark score; o3 Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Anthropic

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max is a frontier model from Anthropic. It offers a 128,000-token context window, costs $16.88 per million input tokens and $83.20 per million output tokens, and averages 83.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.88 / 1M
Output
$83.20 / 1M
Context
128,000
Avg score
83.7
Open weights
No
Full Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max page
OpenAI

o3 Turbo

o3 Turbo is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $16.63 per million input tokens and $83.71 per million output tokens, and averages 83.4 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.63 / 1M
Output
$83.71 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
83.4
Open weights
No
Full o3 Turbo page

Specification comparison

SpecClaude 3.7 Sonnet Maxo3 TurboEdge
Input price / 1M$16.88$16.63B
Output price / 1M$83.20$83.71A
Context window128,000200,000B
Max output32,7684,096A
Average score83.783.4A
Arena Elo1461.61456.2A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max wins 6, o3 Turbo wins 6, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkClaude 3.7 Sonnet Maxo3 TurboGapWinner
MMLU-Pro86.082.73.3Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max
GPQA Diamond76.877.70.9o3 Turbo
SWE-bench Verified76.170.75.4Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max
HumanEval90.987.43.5Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max
MATH-50087.290.63.4o3 Turbo
AIME 202580.783.02.3o3 Turbo
LiveCodeBench78.180.72.6o3 Turbo
IFEval90.089.10.9Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max
TruthfulQA84.783.61.1Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max
HellaSwag91.291.80.6o3 Turbo
MMMU78.879.70.9o3 Turbo
Arena Elo1461.61456.25.4Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max costs about $33.46 per million tokens and o3 Turbo costs about $33.40. o3 Turbo is roughly 0% cheaper than Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

o3 Turbo has the larger context window at 200,000 tokens, compared with 128,000 for Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max wins 6, o3 Turbo wins 6, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max leads o3 Turbo by 0.3 points (83.7 versus 83.4).

The price picture favours o3 Turbo. The context picture favours o3 Turbo. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max for quality-sensitive work and o3 Turbo for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • You need the larger 32,768-token output limit.

Choose o3 Turbo if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 200,000-token context window.

FAQ

Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max better than o3 Turbo?

On the index average, Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max leads o3 Turbo by 0.3 points (83.7 versus 83.4). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max wins 6 benchmarks, o3 Turbo wins 6.

Which is cheaper, Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max or o3 Turbo?

o3 Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $33.40 per million tokens, versus $33.46 for Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max.

Which has the larger context window?

o3 Turbo has the larger context window at 200,000 tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max has 128,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max is proprietary; o3 Turbo is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Claude 3.7 Sonnet Max for quality-sensitive work and o3 Turbo for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons