Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision vs Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo: which model should you choose?
We compared Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision and Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision has the stronger average benchmark score; Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision is a multimodal model from Anthropic. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $13.96 per million input tokens and $56.28 per million output tokens, and averages 81.0 across the index's benchmark suite.
- Input
- $13.96 / 1M
- Output
- $56.28 / 1M
- Context
- 400,000
- Avg score
- 81.0
- Open weights
- No
Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo
Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo is a multimodal model from ByteDance. It offers a 128,000-token context window, costs $13.81 per million input tokens and $71.10 per million output tokens, and averages 79.4 across the index's benchmark suite.
- Input
- $13.81 / 1M
- Output
- $71.10 / 1M
- Context
- 128,000
- Avg score
- 79.4
- Open weights
- No
Specification comparison
| Spec | Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision | Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $13.96 | $13.81 | B |
| Output price / 1M | $56.28 | $71.10 | A |
| Context window | 400,000 | 128,000 | A |
| Max output | 8,192 | 65,536 | B |
| Average score | 81.0 | 79.4 | A |
| Arena Elo | 1429.6 | 1433.0 | B |
| Open weights | No | No | Tie |
Benchmark comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision wins 9, Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo wins 3, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision | Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo | Gap | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 82.5 | 80.3 | 2.2 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision |
| GPQA Diamond | 77.3 | 75.4 | 1.9 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision |
| SWE-bench Verified | 72.2 | 67.7 | 4.5 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision |
| HumanEval | 85.4 | 85.0 | 0.4 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision |
| MATH-500 | 84.8 | 81.4 | 3.4 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision |
| AIME 2025 | 80.9 | 75.6 | 5.3 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision |
| LiveCodeBench | 75.7 | 72.3 | 3.4 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision |
| IFEval | 87.9 | 88.9 | 1.0 | Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo |
| TruthfulQA | 81.6 | 80.9 | 0.7 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision |
| HellaSwag | 89.4 | 88.2 | 1.2 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision |
| MMMU | 73.8 | 77.6 | 3.8 | Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo |
| Arena Elo | 1429.6 | 1433.0 | 3.4 | Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo |
Price analysis
On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision costs about $24.54 per million tokens and Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo costs about $28.13. Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision is roughly 13% cheaper than Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision has the larger context window at 400,000 tokens, compared with 128,000 for Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.
Verdict
Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision wins 9, Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo wins 3, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision leads Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo by 1.6 points (81.0 versus 79.4).
The price picture favours Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision. The context picture favours Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.
If you need a single default, start with Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.
Choose Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision if
- You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
- Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
- You need the larger 400,000-token context window.
Choose Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo if
- You need the larger 65,536-token output limit.
FAQ
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision better than Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo?
On the index average, Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision leads Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo by 1.6 points (81.0 versus 79.4). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision wins 9 benchmarks, Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo wins 3.
Which is cheaper, Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision or Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $24.54 per million tokens, versus $28.13 for Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo.
Which has the larger context window?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision has the larger context window at 400,000 tokens. Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo has 128,000 tokens.
Are these models open weights?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision is proprietary; Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo is proprietary.
Which should I choose for production?
If you need a single default, start with Claude 3.7 Sonnet Vision for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.