Head-to-head · multimodal vs frontier

Claude Haiku 4.5 Max vs Grok 3 Reasoning: which model should you choose?

We compared Claude Haiku 4.5 Max and Grok 3 Reasoning on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Claude Haiku 4.5 Max has the stronger average benchmark score; Grok 3 Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5 Max

Claude Haiku 4.5 Max is a multimodal model from Anthropic. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $15.98 per million input tokens and $80.37 per million output tokens, and averages 83.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$15.98 / 1M
Output
$80.37 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
83.8
Open weights
No
Full Claude Haiku 4.5 Max page
xAI

Grok 3 Reasoning

Grok 3 Reasoning is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $16.07 per million input tokens and $74.65 per million output tokens, and averages 82.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.07 / 1M
Output
$74.65 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
82.9
Open weights
No
Full Grok 3 Reasoning page

Specification comparison

SpecClaude Haiku 4.5 MaxGrok 3 ReasoningEdge
Input price / 1M$15.98$16.07A
Output price / 1M$80.37$74.65B
Context window200,000200,000Tie
Max output4,09616,384B
Average score83.882.9A
Arena Elo1452.01448.0A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 Max wins 7, Grok 3 Reasoning wins 2, and 3 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 MaxGrok 3 ReasoningGapWinner
MMLU-Pro86.684.52.1Claude Haiku 4.5 Max
GPQA Diamond80.377.33.0Claude Haiku 4.5 Max
SWE-bench Verified74.074.00.0Tie
HumanEval88.588.50.0Tie
MATH-50088.790.21.5Grok 3 Reasoning
AIME 202578.278.20.0Tie
LiveCodeBench79.276.52.7Claude Haiku 4.5 Max
IFEval89.990.20.3Grok 3 Reasoning
TruthfulQA83.783.40.3Claude Haiku 4.5 Max
HellaSwag91.189.71.4Claude Haiku 4.5 Max
MMMU81.479.42.0Claude Haiku 4.5 Max
Arena Elo1452.01448.04.0Claude Haiku 4.5 Max

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude Haiku 4.5 Max costs about $32.08 per million tokens and Grok 3 Reasoning costs about $30.72. Grok 3 Reasoning is roughly 4% cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 Max. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Both models list a 200,000-token context window. That is enough for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 Max wins 7, Grok 3 Reasoning wins 2, and 3 are tied. On the index average, Claude Haiku 4.5 Max leads Grok 3 Reasoning by 0.9 points (83.8 versus 82.9).

The price picture favours Grok 3 Reasoning. The context picture is effectively a tie. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Claude Haiku 4.5 Max for quality-sensitive work and Grok 3 Reasoning for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.

Choose Grok 3 Reasoning if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 16,384-token output limit.

FAQ

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 Max better than Grok 3 Reasoning?

On the index average, Claude Haiku 4.5 Max leads Grok 3 Reasoning by 0.9 points (83.8 versus 82.9). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude Haiku 4.5 Max wins 7 benchmarks, Grok 3 Reasoning wins 2.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 Max or Grok 3 Reasoning?

Grok 3 Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $30.72 per million tokens, versus $32.08 for Claude Haiku 4.5 Max.

Which has the larger context window?

Both models list a 200,000-token context window.

Are these models open weights?

Claude Haiku 4.5 Max is proprietary; Grok 3 Reasoning is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Claude Haiku 4.5 Max for quality-sensitive work and Grok 3 Reasoning for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons