Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro vs GPT-4.1 Vision: which model should you choose?
We compared Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro and GPT-4.1 Vision on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. GPT-4.1 Vision has the stronger average benchmark score; Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.
Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro is a multimodal model from Anthropic. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $15.07 per million input tokens and $73.96 per million output tokens, and averages 80.8 across the index's benchmark suite.
- Input
- $15.07 / 1M
- Output
- $73.96 / 1M
- Context
- 1,000,000
- Avg score
- 80.8
- Open weights
- No
GPT-4.1 Vision
GPT-4.1 Vision is a multimodal model from OpenAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $14.88 per million input tokens and $81.24 per million output tokens, and averages 82.0 across the index's benchmark suite.
- Input
- $14.88 / 1M
- Output
- $81.24 / 1M
- Context
- 1,000,000
- Avg score
- 82.0
- Open weights
- No
Specification comparison
| Spec | Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro | GPT-4.1 Vision | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $15.07 | $14.88 | B |
| Output price / 1M | $73.96 | $81.24 | A |
| Context window | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | Tie |
| Max output | 8,192 | 8,192 | Tie |
| Average score | 80.8 | 82.0 | B |
| Arena Elo | 1436.2 | 1451.8 | B |
| Open weights | No | No | Tie |
Benchmark comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro wins 2, GPT-4.1 Vision wins 10, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro | GPT-4.1 Vision | Gap | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 81.5 | 84.0 | 2.5 | GPT-4.1 Vision |
| GPQA Diamond | 75.7 | 79.3 | 3.6 | GPT-4.1 Vision |
| SWE-bench Verified | 70.4 | 72.4 | 2.0 | GPT-4.1 Vision |
| HumanEval | 86.0 | 86.8 | 0.8 | GPT-4.1 Vision |
| MATH-500 | 83.7 | 87.5 | 3.8 | GPT-4.1 Vision |
| AIME 2025 | 80.1 | 77.2 | 2.9 | Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro |
| LiveCodeBench | 72.4 | 74.3 | 1.9 | GPT-4.1 Vision |
| IFEval | 90.1 | 88.7 | 1.4 | Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro |
| TruthfulQA | 84.1 | 84.4 | 0.3 | GPT-4.1 Vision |
| HellaSwag | 89.3 | 89.7 | 0.4 | GPT-4.1 Vision |
| MMMU | 75.3 | 77.5 | 2.2 | GPT-4.1 Vision |
| Arena Elo | 1436.2 | 1451.8 | 15.6 | GPT-4.1 Vision |
Price analysis
On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro costs about $29.79 per million tokens and GPT-4.1 Vision costs about $31.47. Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro is roughly 5% cheaper than GPT-4.1 Vision. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.
Both models list a 1,000,000-token context window. That is enough for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.
Verdict
Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro wins 2, GPT-4.1 Vision wins 10, and 0 are tied. On the index average, GPT-4.1 Vision leads Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro by 1.2 points (82.0 versus 80.8).
The price picture favours Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro. The context picture is effectively a tie. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.
If you need a single default, start with GPT-4.1 Vision for quality-sensitive work and Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro if
- Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
Choose GPT-4.1 Vision if
- You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
FAQ
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro better than GPT-4.1 Vision?
On the index average, GPT-4.1 Vision leads Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro by 1.2 points (82.0 versus 80.8). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro wins 2 benchmarks, GPT-4.1 Vision wins 10.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro or GPT-4.1 Vision?
Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $29.79 per million tokens, versus $31.47 for GPT-4.1 Vision.
Which has the larger context window?
Both models list a 1,000,000-token context window.
Are these models open weights?
Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro is proprietary; GPT-4.1 Vision is proprietary.
Which should I choose for production?
If you need a single default, start with GPT-4.1 Vision for quality-sensitive work and Claude Haiku 4.5 Pro for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.