Head-to-head · multimodal vs multimodal

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Doubao 1.5 Pro: which model should you choose?

We compared Claude Haiku 4.5 and Doubao 1.5 Pro on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Doubao 1.5 Pro has the stronger average benchmark score; Doubao 1.5 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5 is a multimodal model from Anthropic. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $13.86 per million input tokens and $74.67 per million output tokens, and averages 79.4 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$13.86 / 1M
Output
$74.67 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
79.4
Open weights
No
Full Claude Haiku 4.5 page
ByteDance

Doubao 1.5 Pro

Doubao 1.5 Pro is a multimodal model from ByteDance. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $13.65 per million input tokens and $48.98 per million output tokens, and averages 79.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$13.65 / 1M
Output
$48.98 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
79.7
Open weights
No
Full Doubao 1.5 Pro page

Specification comparison

SpecClaude Haiku 4.5Doubao 1.5 ProEdge
Input price / 1M$13.86$13.65B
Output price / 1M$74.67$48.98B
Context window1,000,000200,000A
Max output128,000128,000Tie
Average score79.479.7B
Arena Elo1421.81428.3B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 wins 5, Doubao 1.5 Pro wins 7, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Doubao 1.5 ProGapWinner
MMLU-Pro84.182.81.3Claude Haiku 4.5
GPQA Diamond74.173.11.0Claude Haiku 4.5
SWE-bench Verified69.270.41.2Doubao 1.5 Pro
HumanEval84.782.62.1Claude Haiku 4.5
MATH-50081.484.43.0Doubao 1.5 Pro
AIME 202576.575.21.3Claude Haiku 4.5
LiveCodeBench71.673.72.1Doubao 1.5 Pro
IFEval85.285.50.3Doubao 1.5 Pro
TruthfulQA79.681.62.0Doubao 1.5 Pro
HellaSwag89.688.90.7Claude Haiku 4.5
MMMU77.679.01.4Doubao 1.5 Pro
Arena Elo1421.81428.36.5Doubao 1.5 Pro

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs about $29.06 per million tokens and Doubao 1.5 Pro costs about $22.48. Doubao 1.5 Pro is roughly 23% cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Claude Haiku 4.5 has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 200,000 for Doubao 1.5 Pro. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 wins 5, Doubao 1.5 Pro wins 7, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Doubao 1.5 Pro leads Claude Haiku 4.5 by 0.3 points (79.7 versus 79.4).

The price picture favours Doubao 1.5 Pro. The context picture favours Claude Haiku 4.5. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Doubao 1.5 Pro for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if

  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.

Choose Doubao 1.5 Pro if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

FAQ

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Doubao 1.5 Pro?

On the index average, Doubao 1.5 Pro leads Claude Haiku 4.5 by 0.3 points (79.7 versus 79.4). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude Haiku 4.5 wins 5 benchmarks, Doubao 1.5 Pro wins 7.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Doubao 1.5 Pro?

Doubao 1.5 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $22.48 per million tokens, versus $29.06 for Claude Haiku 4.5.

Which has the larger context window?

Claude Haiku 4.5 has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. Doubao 1.5 Pro has 200,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is proprietary; Doubao 1.5 Pro is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Doubao 1.5 Pro for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons