Head-to-head · multimodal vs multimodal

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs ERNIE 4.5 Turbo: which model should you choose?

We compared Claude Haiku 4.5 and ERNIE 4.5 Turbo on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. ERNIE 4.5 Turbo has the stronger average benchmark score; ERNIE 4.5 Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5 is a multimodal model from Anthropic. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $13.86 per million input tokens and $74.67 per million output tokens, and averages 79.4 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$13.86 / 1M
Output
$74.67 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
79.4
Open weights
No
Full Claude Haiku 4.5 page
Baidu

ERNIE 4.5 Turbo

ERNIE 4.5 Turbo is a multimodal model from Baidu. It offers a 128,000-token context window, costs $13.75 per million input tokens and $54.36 per million output tokens, and averages 79.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$13.75 / 1M
Output
$54.36 / 1M
Context
128,000
Avg score
79.7
Open weights
No
Full ERNIE 4.5 Turbo page

Specification comparison

SpecClaude Haiku 4.5ERNIE 4.5 TurboEdge
Input price / 1M$13.86$13.75B
Output price / 1M$74.67$54.36B
Context window1,000,000128,000A
Max output128,00032,768A
Average score79.479.7B
Arena Elo1421.81419.8A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 wins 7, ERNIE 4.5 Turbo wins 4, and 1 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5ERNIE 4.5 TurboGapWinner
MMLU-Pro84.184.00.1Claude Haiku 4.5
GPQA Diamond74.173.01.1Claude Haiku 4.5
SWE-bench Verified69.267.51.7Claude Haiku 4.5
HumanEval84.786.41.7ERNIE 4.5 Turbo
MATH-50081.486.45.0ERNIE 4.5 Turbo
AIME 202576.580.74.2ERNIE 4.5 Turbo
LiveCodeBench71.670.51.1Claude Haiku 4.5
IFEval85.285.20.0Tie
TruthfulQA79.682.52.9ERNIE 4.5 Turbo
HellaSwag89.687.02.6Claude Haiku 4.5
MMMU77.673.73.9Claude Haiku 4.5
Arena Elo1421.81419.82.0Claude Haiku 4.5

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs about $29.06 per million tokens and ERNIE 4.5 Turbo costs about $23.90. ERNIE 4.5 Turbo is roughly 18% cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Claude Haiku 4.5 has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 128,000 for ERNIE 4.5 Turbo. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 wins 7, ERNIE 4.5 Turbo wins 4, and 1 are tied. On the index average, ERNIE 4.5 Turbo leads Claude Haiku 4.5 by 0.3 points (79.7 versus 79.4).

The price picture favours ERNIE 4.5 Turbo. The context picture favours Claude Haiku 4.5. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with ERNIE 4.5 Turbo for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if

  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

Choose ERNIE 4.5 Turbo if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

FAQ

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than ERNIE 4.5 Turbo?

On the index average, ERNIE 4.5 Turbo leads Claude Haiku 4.5 by 0.3 points (79.7 versus 79.4). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude Haiku 4.5 wins 7 benchmarks, ERNIE 4.5 Turbo wins 4.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or ERNIE 4.5 Turbo?

ERNIE 4.5 Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $23.90 per million tokens, versus $29.06 for Claude Haiku 4.5.

Which has the larger context window?

Claude Haiku 4.5 has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. ERNIE 4.5 Turbo has 128,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is proprietary; ERNIE 4.5 Turbo is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with ERNIE 4.5 Turbo for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons