Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Claude Opus 4.5 Max vs GPT-5.1 Max: which model should you choose?

We compared Claude Opus 4.5 Max and GPT-5.1 Max on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. GPT-5.1 Max has the stronger average benchmark score; GPT-5.1 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5 Max

Claude Opus 4.5 Max is a frontier model from Anthropic. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $20.90 per million input tokens and $106.51 per million output tokens, and averages 87.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$20.90 / 1M
Output
$106.51 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
87.8
Open weights
No
Full Claude Opus 4.5 Max page
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Max

GPT-5.1 Max is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $20.50 per million input tokens and $103.98 per million output tokens, and averages 87.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$20.50 / 1M
Output
$103.98 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
87.9
Open weights
No
Full GPT-5.1 Max page

Specification comparison

SpecClaude Opus 4.5 MaxGPT-5.1 MaxEdge
Input price / 1M$20.90$20.50B
Output price / 1M$106.51$103.98B
Context window1,000,0002,000,000B
Max output16,3848,192A
Average score87.887.9B
Arena Elo1501.91478.2A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 Max wins 6, GPT-5.1 Max wins 6, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 MaxGPT-5.1 MaxGapWinner
MMLU-Pro89.591.31.8GPT-5.1 Max
GPQA Diamond84.686.41.8GPT-5.1 Max
SWE-bench Verified79.575.63.9Claude Opus 4.5 Max
HumanEval91.792.20.5GPT-5.1 Max
MATH-50094.291.32.9Claude Opus 4.5 Max
AIME 202589.388.80.5Claude Opus 4.5 Max
LiveCodeBench80.680.20.4Claude Opus 4.5 Max
IFEval94.592.22.3Claude Opus 4.5 Max
TruthfulQA86.991.14.2GPT-5.1 Max
HellaSwag93.093.10.1GPT-5.1 Max
MMMU82.385.12.8GPT-5.1 Max
Arena Elo1501.91478.223.7Claude Opus 4.5 Max

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude Opus 4.5 Max costs about $42.30 per million tokens and GPT-5.1 Max costs about $41.37. GPT-5.1 Max is roughly 2% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5 Max. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

GPT-5.1 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 for Claude Opus 4.5 Max. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 Max wins 6, GPT-5.1 Max wins 6, and 0 are tied. On the index average, GPT-5.1 Max leads Claude Opus 4.5 Max by 0.1 points (87.9 versus 87.8).

The price picture favours GPT-5.1 Max. The context picture favours GPT-5.1 Max. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.1 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 Max if

  • You need the larger 16,384-token output limit.

Choose GPT-5.1 Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.5 Max better than GPT-5.1 Max?

On the index average, GPT-5.1 Max leads Claude Opus 4.5 Max by 0.1 points (87.9 versus 87.8). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude Opus 4.5 Max wins 6 benchmarks, GPT-5.1 Max wins 6.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 Max or GPT-5.1 Max?

GPT-5.1 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $41.37 per million tokens, versus $42.30 for Claude Opus 4.5 Max.

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-5.1 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 Max has 1,000,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Claude Opus 4.5 Max is proprietary; GPT-5.1 Max is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.1 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons