Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Claude Opus 4.5 Max vs GPT-5.2 Max: which model should you choose?

We compared Claude Opus 4.5 Max and GPT-5.2 Max on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. GPT-5.2 Max has the stronger average benchmark score; GPT-5.2 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5 Max

Claude Opus 4.5 Max is a frontier model from Anthropic. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $20.90 per million input tokens and $106.51 per million output tokens, and averages 87.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$20.90 / 1M
Output
$106.51 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
87.8
Open weights
No
Full Claude Opus 4.5 Max page
OpenAI

GPT-5.2 Max

GPT-5.2 Max is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $21.39 per million input tokens and $90.69 per million output tokens, and averages 89.2 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$21.39 / 1M
Output
$90.69 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
89.2
Open weights
No
Full GPT-5.2 Max page

Specification comparison

SpecClaude Opus 4.5 MaxGPT-5.2 MaxEdge
Input price / 1M$20.90$21.39A
Output price / 1M$106.51$90.69B
Context window1,000,0001,000,000Tie
Max output16,384128,000B
Average score87.889.2B
Arena Elo1501.91495.3A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 Max wins 4, GPT-5.2 Max wins 8, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 MaxGPT-5.2 MaxGapWinner
MMLU-Pro89.587.61.9Claude Opus 4.5 Max
GPQA Diamond84.683.41.2Claude Opus 4.5 Max
SWE-bench Verified79.580.51.0GPT-5.2 Max
HumanEval91.793.61.9GPT-5.2 Max
MATH-50094.296.72.5GPT-5.2 Max
AIME 202589.388.21.1Claude Opus 4.5 Max
LiveCodeBench80.684.84.2GPT-5.2 Max
IFEval94.595.20.7GPT-5.2 Max
TruthfulQA86.988.11.2GPT-5.2 Max
HellaSwag93.096.13.1GPT-5.2 Max
MMMU82.386.94.6GPT-5.2 Max
Arena Elo1501.91495.36.6Claude Opus 4.5 Max

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude Opus 4.5 Max costs about $42.30 per million tokens and GPT-5.2 Max costs about $38.72. GPT-5.2 Max is roughly 8% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5 Max. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Both models list a 1,000,000-token context window. That is enough for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 Max wins 4, GPT-5.2 Max wins 8, and 0 are tied. On the index average, GPT-5.2 Max leads Claude Opus 4.5 Max by 1.4 points (89.2 versus 87.8).

The price picture favours GPT-5.2 Max. The context picture is effectively a tie. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.2 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 Max if

  • You prefer Anthropic's tooling or already use it.

Choose GPT-5.2 Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.5 Max better than GPT-5.2 Max?

On the index average, GPT-5.2 Max leads Claude Opus 4.5 Max by 1.4 points (89.2 versus 87.8). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude Opus 4.5 Max wins 4 benchmarks, GPT-5.2 Max wins 8.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 Max or GPT-5.2 Max?

GPT-5.2 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $38.72 per million tokens, versus $42.30 for Claude Opus 4.5 Max.

Which has the larger context window?

Both models list a 1,000,000-token context window.

Are these models open weights?

Claude Opus 4.5 Max is proprietary; GPT-5.2 Max is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.2 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons