Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo vs Grok 4 Max: which model should you choose?

We compared Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo and Grok 4 Max on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Grok 4 Max has the stronger average benchmark score; Grok 4 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo is a frontier model from Anthropic. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $19.57 per million input tokens and $106.60 per million output tokens, and averages 85.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.57 / 1M
Output
$106.60 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
85.7
Open weights
No
Full Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo page
xAI

Grok 4 Max

Grok 4 Max is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $19.70 per million input tokens and $98.29 per million output tokens, and averages 86.6 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.70 / 1M
Output
$98.29 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
86.6
Open weights
No
Full Grok 4 Max page

Specification comparison

SpecClaude Opus 4.5 TurboGrok 4 MaxEdge
Input price / 1M$19.57$19.70A
Output price / 1M$106.60$98.29B
Context window2,000,0002,000,000Tie
Max output65,53616,384A
Average score85.786.6B
Arena Elo1469.31491.4B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo wins 2, Grok 4 Max wins 10, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 TurboGrok 4 MaxGapWinner
MMLU-Pro85.887.82.0Grok 4 Max
GPQA Diamond81.982.00.1Grok 4 Max
SWE-bench Verified75.074.30.7Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo
HumanEval89.893.43.6Grok 4 Max
MATH-50093.294.61.4Grok 4 Max
AIME 202587.287.30.1Grok 4 Max
LiveCodeBench78.581.32.8Grok 4 Max
IFEval92.292.50.3Grok 4 Max
TruthfulQA85.585.80.3Grok 4 Max
HellaSwag92.894.11.3Grok 4 Max
MMMU80.580.00.5Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo
Arena Elo1469.31491.422.1Grok 4 Max

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo costs about $41.33 per million tokens and Grok 4 Max costs about $39.35. Grok 4 Max is roughly 5% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Both models list a 2,000,000-token context window. That is enough for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo wins 2, Grok 4 Max wins 10, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Grok 4 Max leads Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo by 0.9 points (86.6 versus 85.7).

The price picture favours Grok 4 Max. The context picture is effectively a tie. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Grok 4 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo if

  • You need the larger 65,536-token output limit.

Choose Grok 4 Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo better than Grok 4 Max?

On the index average, Grok 4 Max leads Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo by 0.9 points (86.6 versus 85.7). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo wins 2 benchmarks, Grok 4 Max wins 10.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo or Grok 4 Max?

Grok 4 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $39.35 per million tokens, versus $41.33 for Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo.

Which has the larger context window?

Both models list a 2,000,000-token context window.

Are these models open weights?

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo is proprietary; Grok 4 Max is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Grok 4 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons