Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo vs o4 Max: which model should you choose?

We compared Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo and o4 Max on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. o4 Max has the stronger average benchmark score; o4 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo is a frontier model from Anthropic. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $19.57 per million input tokens and $106.60 per million output tokens, and averages 85.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.57 / 1M
Output
$106.60 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
85.7
Open weights
No
Full Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo page
OpenAI

o4 Max

o4 Max is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $19.51 per million input tokens and $93.98 per million output tokens, and averages 86.2 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.51 / 1M
Output
$93.98 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
86.2
Open weights
No
Full o4 Max page

Specification comparison

SpecClaude Opus 4.5 Turboo4 MaxEdge
Input price / 1M$19.57$19.51B
Output price / 1M$106.60$93.98B
Context window2,000,0002,000,000Tie
Max output65,53665,536Tie
Average score85.786.2B
Arena Elo1469.31486.0B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo wins 5, o4 Max wins 7, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 Turboo4 MaxGapWinner
MMLU-Pro85.886.30.5o4 Max
GPQA Diamond81.980.11.8Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo
SWE-bench Verified75.079.84.8o4 Max
HumanEval89.894.64.8o4 Max
MATH-50093.290.62.6Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo
AIME 202587.284.82.4Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo
LiveCodeBench78.580.62.1o4 Max
IFEval92.291.11.1Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo
TruthfulQA85.587.11.6o4 Max
HellaSwag92.891.71.1Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo
MMMU80.581.91.4o4 Max
Arena Elo1469.31486.016.7o4 Max

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo costs about $41.33 per million tokens and o4 Max costs about $38.13. o4 Max is roughly 8% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Both models list a 2,000,000-token context window. That is enough for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo wins 5, o4 Max wins 7, and 0 are tied. On the index average, o4 Max leads Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo by 0.5 points (86.2 versus 85.7).

The price picture favours o4 Max. The context picture is effectively a tie. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with o4 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo if

  • You prefer Anthropic's tooling or already use it.

Choose o4 Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo better than o4 Max?

On the index average, o4 Max leads Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo by 0.5 points (86.2 versus 85.7). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo wins 5 benchmarks, o4 Max wins 7.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo or o4 Max?

o4 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $38.13 per million tokens, versus $41.33 for Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo.

Which has the larger context window?

Both models list a 2,000,000-token context window.

Are these models open weights?

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo is proprietary; o4 Max is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with o4 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons