Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo vs o4 Pro: which model should you choose?

We compared Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo and o4 Pro on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. o4 Pro has the stronger average benchmark score; o4 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo is a frontier model from Anthropic. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $19.57 per million input tokens and $106.60 per million output tokens, and averages 85.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.57 / 1M
Output
$106.60 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
85.7
Open weights
No
Full Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo page
OpenAI

o4 Pro

o4 Pro is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $19.37 per million input tokens and $70.19 per million output tokens, and averages 87.3 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.37 / 1M
Output
$70.19 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
87.3
Open weights
No
Full o4 Pro page

Specification comparison

SpecClaude Opus 4.5 Turboo4 ProEdge
Input price / 1M$19.57$19.37B
Output price / 1M$106.60$70.19B
Context window2,000,0001,000,000A
Max output65,53616,384A
Average score85.787.3B
Arena Elo1469.31471.2B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo wins 2, o4 Pro wins 10, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 Turboo4 ProGapWinner
MMLU-Pro85.887.71.9o4 Pro
GPQA Diamond81.982.70.8o4 Pro
SWE-bench Verified75.078.53.5o4 Pro
HumanEval89.892.12.3o4 Pro
MATH-50093.289.83.4Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo
AIME 202587.289.92.7o4 Pro
LiveCodeBench78.581.83.3o4 Pro
IFEval92.290.91.3Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo
TruthfulQA85.587.92.4o4 Pro
HellaSwag92.894.41.6o4 Pro
MMMU80.584.13.6o4 Pro
Arena Elo1469.31471.21.9o4 Pro

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo costs about $41.33 per million tokens and o4 Pro costs about $32.08. o4 Pro is roughly 22% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 for o4 Pro. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo wins 2, o4 Pro wins 10, and 0 are tied. On the index average, o4 Pro leads Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo by 1.6 points (87.3 versus 85.7).

The price picture favours o4 Pro. The context picture favours Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with o4 Pro for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo if

  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 65,536-token output limit.

Choose o4 Pro if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo better than o4 Pro?

On the index average, o4 Pro leads Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo by 1.6 points (87.3 versus 85.7). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo wins 2 benchmarks, o4 Pro wins 10.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo or o4 Pro?

o4 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $32.08 per million tokens, versus $41.33 for Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo.

Which has the larger context window?

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. o4 Pro has 1,000,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo is proprietary; o4 Pro is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with o4 Pro for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons