Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Claude Opus 4.5 Vision vs Gemini 3 Flash Pro: which model should you choose?

We compared Claude Opus 4.5 Vision and Gemini 3 Flash Pro on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 Vision has the stronger average benchmark score; Claude Opus 4.5 Vision is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5 Vision

Claude Opus 4.5 Vision is a frontier model from Anthropic. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $17.70 per million input tokens and $74.84 per million output tokens, and averages 85.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.70 / 1M
Output
$74.84 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
85.9
Open weights
No
Full Claude Opus 4.5 Vision page
Google DeepMind

Gemini 3 Flash Pro

Gemini 3 Flash Pro is a frontier model from Google DeepMind. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $17.71 per million input tokens and $86.50 per million output tokens, and averages 84.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.71 / 1M
Output
$86.50 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
84.8
Open weights
No
Full Gemini 3 Flash Pro page

Specification comparison

SpecClaude Opus 4.5 VisionGemini 3 Flash ProEdge
Input price / 1M$17.70$17.71A
Output price / 1M$74.84$86.50A
Context window200,000400,000B
Max output32,7684,096A
Average score85.984.8A
Arena Elo1452.21469.2B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 Vision wins 7, Gemini 3 Flash Pro wins 5, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 VisionGemini 3 Flash ProGapWinner
MMLU-Pro86.987.00.1Gemini 3 Flash Pro
GPQA Diamond80.777.73.0Claude Opus 4.5 Vision
SWE-bench Verified77.773.34.4Claude Opus 4.5 Vision
HumanEval88.289.91.7Gemini 3 Flash Pro
MATH-50091.991.80.1Claude Opus 4.5 Vision
AIME 202585.479.95.5Claude Opus 4.5 Vision
LiveCodeBench80.180.20.1Gemini 3 Flash Pro
IFEval92.692.80.2Gemini 3 Flash Pro
TruthfulQA86.986.20.7Claude Opus 4.5 Vision
HellaSwag91.490.60.8Claude Opus 4.5 Vision
MMMU83.283.00.2Claude Opus 4.5 Vision
Arena Elo1452.21469.217.0Gemini 3 Flash Pro

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude Opus 4.5 Vision costs about $31.98 per million tokens and Gemini 3 Flash Pro costs about $34.91. Claude Opus 4.5 Vision is roughly 8% cheaper than Gemini 3 Flash Pro. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Gemini 3 Flash Pro has the larger context window at 400,000 tokens, compared with 200,000 for Claude Opus 4.5 Vision. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 Vision wins 7, Gemini 3 Flash Pro wins 5, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Claude Opus 4.5 Vision leads Gemini 3 Flash Pro by 1.1 points (85.9 versus 84.8).

The price picture favours Claude Opus 4.5 Vision. The context picture favours Gemini 3 Flash Pro. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Claude Opus 4.5 Vision for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 Vision if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 32,768-token output limit.

Choose Gemini 3 Flash Pro if

  • You need the larger 400,000-token context window.

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.5 Vision better than Gemini 3 Flash Pro?

On the index average, Claude Opus 4.5 Vision leads Gemini 3 Flash Pro by 1.1 points (85.9 versus 84.8). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude Opus 4.5 Vision wins 7 benchmarks, Gemini 3 Flash Pro wins 5.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 Vision or Gemini 3 Flash Pro?

Claude Opus 4.5 Vision is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $31.98 per million tokens, versus $34.91 for Gemini 3 Flash Pro.

Which has the larger context window?

Gemini 3 Flash Pro has the larger context window at 400,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 Vision has 200,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Claude Opus 4.5 Vision is proprietary; Gemini 3 Flash Pro is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Claude Opus 4.5 Vision for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons