Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Claude Opus 4.5 Vision vs Grok 3 Max: which model should you choose?

We compared Claude Opus 4.5 Vision and Grok 3 Max on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 Vision and Grok 3 Max are effectively tied on the index average; Claude Opus 4.5 Vision is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5 Vision

Claude Opus 4.5 Vision is a frontier model from Anthropic. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $17.70 per million input tokens and $74.84 per million output tokens, and averages 85.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.70 / 1M
Output
$74.84 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
85.9
Open weights
No
Full Claude Opus 4.5 Vision page
xAI

Grok 3 Max

Grok 3 Max is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $17.66 per million input tokens and $89.12 per million output tokens, and averages 85.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.66 / 1M
Output
$89.12 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
85.9
Open weights
No
Full Grok 3 Max page

Specification comparison

SpecClaude Opus 4.5 VisionGrok 3 MaxEdge
Input price / 1M$17.70$17.66B
Output price / 1M$74.84$89.12A
Context window200,0002,000,000B
Max output32,76832,768Tie
Average score85.985.9Tie
Arena Elo1452.21475.8B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 Vision wins 4, Grok 3 Max wins 6, and 2 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 VisionGrok 3 MaxGapWinner
MMLU-Pro86.987.30.4Grok 3 Max
GPQA Diamond80.780.90.2Grok 3 Max
SWE-bench Verified77.773.64.1Claude Opus 4.5 Vision
HumanEval88.291.93.7Grok 3 Max
MATH-50091.991.90.0Tie
AIME 202585.486.61.2Grok 3 Max
LiveCodeBench80.179.70.4Claude Opus 4.5 Vision
IFEval92.692.60.0Tie
TruthfulQA86.986.70.2Claude Opus 4.5 Vision
HellaSwag91.491.80.4Grok 3 Max
MMMU83.282.30.9Claude Opus 4.5 Vision
Arena Elo1452.21475.823.6Grok 3 Max

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude Opus 4.5 Vision costs about $31.98 per million tokens and Grok 3 Max costs about $35.53. Claude Opus 4.5 Vision is roughly 10% cheaper than Grok 3 Max. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Grok 3 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 200,000 for Claude Opus 4.5 Vision. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 Vision wins 4, Grok 3 Max wins 6, and 2 are tied. The two models are effectively tied on the index average at 85.9.

The price picture favours Claude Opus 4.5 Vision. The context picture favours Grok 3 Max. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Claude Opus 4.5 Vision if cost is the constraint and Grok 3 Max if context is the constraint. Test both on a sample of your own traffic before committing.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 Vision if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

Choose Grok 3 Max if

  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.5 Vision better than Grok 3 Max?

The two models are effectively tied on the index average at 85.9. The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude Opus 4.5 Vision wins 4 benchmarks, Grok 3 Max wins 6.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 Vision or Grok 3 Max?

Claude Opus 4.5 Vision is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $31.98 per million tokens, versus $35.53 for Grok 3 Max.

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 3 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 Vision has 200,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Claude Opus 4.5 Vision is proprietary; Grok 3 Max is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Claude Opus 4.5 Vision if cost is the constraint and Grok 3 Max if context is the constraint. Test both on a sample of your own traffic before committing.

Related comparisons