Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo: which model should you choose?

We compared Claude Opus 4.5 and Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 has the stronger average benchmark score; Claude Opus 4.5 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5 is a frontier model from Anthropic. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $19.42 per million input tokens and $75.27 per million output tokens, and averages 87.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.42 / 1M
Output
$75.27 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
87.7
Open weights
No
Full Claude Opus 4.5 page
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo is a frontier model from Anthropic. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $19.57 per million input tokens and $106.60 per million output tokens, and averages 85.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.57 / 1M
Output
$106.60 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
85.7
Open weights
No
Full Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo page

Specification comparison

SpecClaude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.5 TurboEdge
Input price / 1M$19.42$19.57A
Output price / 1M$75.27$106.60A
Context window400,0002,000,000B
Max output4,09665,536B
Average score87.785.7A
Arena Elo1491.21469.3A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 wins 10, Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo wins 2, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Claude Opus 4.5 TurboGapWinner
MMLU-Pro87.085.81.2Claude Opus 4.5
GPQA Diamond81.781.90.2Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo
SWE-bench Verified77.175.02.1Claude Opus 4.5
HumanEval93.789.83.9Claude Opus 4.5
MATH-50093.793.20.5Claude Opus 4.5
AIME 202589.887.22.6Claude Opus 4.5
LiveCodeBench85.078.56.5Claude Opus 4.5
IFEval92.592.20.3Claude Opus 4.5
TruthfulQA88.185.52.6Claude Opus 4.5
HellaSwag92.492.80.4Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo
MMMU84.280.53.7Claude Opus 4.5
Arena Elo1491.21469.321.9Claude Opus 4.5

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude Opus 4.5 costs about $33.38 per million tokens and Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo costs about $41.33. Claude Opus 4.5 is roughly 19% cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 400,000 for Claude Opus 4.5. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 wins 10, Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo wins 2, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Claude Opus 4.5 leads Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo by 2.0 points (87.7 versus 85.7).

The price picture favours Claude Opus 4.5. The context picture favours Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Claude Opus 4.5 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo if

  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 65,536-token output limit.

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo?

On the index average, Claude Opus 4.5 leads Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo by 2.0 points (87.7 versus 85.7). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude Opus 4.5 wins 10 benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo wins 2.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo?

Claude Opus 4.5 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $33.38 per million tokens, versus $41.33 for Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo.

Which has the larger context window?

Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 has 400,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Claude Opus 4.5 is proprietary; Claude Opus 4.5 Turbo is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Claude Opus 4.5 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons