Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Pro Turbo: which model should you choose?

We compared Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemini 3 Pro Turbo on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 has the stronger average benchmark score; Claude Opus 4.5 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5 is a frontier model from Anthropic. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $19.42 per million input tokens and $75.27 per million output tokens, and averages 87.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.42 / 1M
Output
$75.27 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
87.7
Open weights
No
Full Claude Opus 4.5 page
Google DeepMind

Gemini 3 Pro Turbo

Gemini 3 Pro Turbo is a frontier model from Google DeepMind. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $19.62 per million input tokens and $89.91 per million output tokens, and averages 86.4 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.62 / 1M
Output
$89.91 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
86.4
Open weights
No
Full Gemini 3 Pro Turbo page

Specification comparison

SpecClaude Opus 4.5Gemini 3 Pro TurboEdge
Input price / 1M$19.42$19.62A
Output price / 1M$75.27$89.91A
Context window400,000400,000Tie
Max output4,09616,384B
Average score87.786.4A
Arena Elo1491.21494.9B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 wins 8, Gemini 3 Pro Turbo wins 4, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Gemini 3 Pro TurboGapWinner
MMLU-Pro87.085.61.4Claude Opus 4.5
GPQA Diamond81.781.00.7Claude Opus 4.5
SWE-bench Verified77.177.40.3Gemini 3 Pro Turbo
HumanEval93.790.33.4Claude Opus 4.5
MATH-50093.792.41.3Claude Opus 4.5
AIME 202589.882.87.0Claude Opus 4.5
LiveCodeBench85.082.72.3Claude Opus 4.5
IFEval92.593.40.9Gemini 3 Pro Turbo
TruthfulQA88.187.80.3Claude Opus 4.5
HellaSwag92.494.62.2Gemini 3 Pro Turbo
MMMU84.282.71.5Claude Opus 4.5
Arena Elo1491.21494.93.7Gemini 3 Pro Turbo

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude Opus 4.5 costs about $33.38 per million tokens and Gemini 3 Pro Turbo costs about $37.19. Claude Opus 4.5 is roughly 10% cheaper than Gemini 3 Pro Turbo. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Both models list a 400,000-token context window. That is enough for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 wins 8, Gemini 3 Pro Turbo wins 4, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Claude Opus 4.5 leads Gemini 3 Pro Turbo by 1.3 points (87.7 versus 86.4).

The price picture favours Claude Opus 4.5. The context picture is effectively a tie. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Claude Opus 4.5 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

Choose Gemini 3 Pro Turbo if

  • You need the larger 16,384-token output limit.

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Gemini 3 Pro Turbo?

On the index average, Claude Opus 4.5 leads Gemini 3 Pro Turbo by 1.3 points (87.7 versus 86.4). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude Opus 4.5 wins 8 benchmarks, Gemini 3 Pro Turbo wins 4.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 3 Pro Turbo?

Claude Opus 4.5 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $33.38 per million tokens, versus $37.19 for Gemini 3 Pro Turbo.

Which has the larger context window?

Both models list a 400,000-token context window.

Are these models open weights?

Claude Opus 4.5 is proprietary; Gemini 3 Pro Turbo is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Claude Opus 4.5 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons