Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Grok 4 Max: which model should you choose?

We compared Claude Opus 4.5 and Grok 4 Max on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 has the stronger average benchmark score; Claude Opus 4.5 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5 is a frontier model from Anthropic. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $19.42 per million input tokens and $75.27 per million output tokens, and averages 87.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.42 / 1M
Output
$75.27 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
87.7
Open weights
No
Full Claude Opus 4.5 page
xAI

Grok 4 Max

Grok 4 Max is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $19.70 per million input tokens and $98.29 per million output tokens, and averages 86.6 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.70 / 1M
Output
$98.29 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
86.6
Open weights
No
Full Grok 4 Max page

Specification comparison

SpecClaude Opus 4.5Grok 4 MaxEdge
Input price / 1M$19.42$19.70A
Output price / 1M$75.27$98.29A
Context window400,0002,000,000B
Max output4,09616,384B
Average score87.786.6A
Arena Elo1491.21491.4B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 wins 6, Grok 4 Max wins 5, and 1 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Grok 4 MaxGapWinner
MMLU-Pro87.087.80.8Grok 4 Max
GPQA Diamond81.782.00.3Grok 4 Max
SWE-bench Verified77.174.32.8Claude Opus 4.5
HumanEval93.793.40.3Claude Opus 4.5
MATH-50093.794.60.9Grok 4 Max
AIME 202589.887.32.5Claude Opus 4.5
LiveCodeBench85.081.33.7Claude Opus 4.5
IFEval92.592.50.0Tie
TruthfulQA88.185.82.3Claude Opus 4.5
HellaSwag92.494.11.7Grok 4 Max
MMMU84.280.04.2Claude Opus 4.5
Arena Elo1491.21491.40.2Grok 4 Max

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude Opus 4.5 costs about $33.38 per million tokens and Grok 4 Max costs about $39.35. Claude Opus 4.5 is roughly 15% cheaper than Grok 4 Max. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Grok 4 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 400,000 for Claude Opus 4.5. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 wins 6, Grok 4 Max wins 5, and 1 are tied. On the index average, Claude Opus 4.5 leads Grok 4 Max by 1.1 points (87.7 versus 86.6).

The price picture favours Claude Opus 4.5. The context picture favours Grok 4 Max. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Claude Opus 4.5 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

Choose Grok 4 Max if

  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 16,384-token output limit.

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Grok 4 Max?

On the index average, Claude Opus 4.5 leads Grok 4 Max by 1.1 points (87.7 versus 86.6). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude Opus 4.5 wins 6 benchmarks, Grok 4 Max wins 5.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Grok 4 Max?

Claude Opus 4.5 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $33.38 per million tokens, versus $39.35 for Grok 4 Max.

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 has 400,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Claude Opus 4.5 is proprietary; Grok 4 Max is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Claude Opus 4.5 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons