Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Grok 4 Pro: which model should you choose?

We compared Claude Opus 4.5 and Grok 4 Pro on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 has the stronger average benchmark score; Claude Opus 4.5 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5 is a frontier model from Anthropic. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $19.42 per million input tokens and $75.27 per million output tokens, and averages 87.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.42 / 1M
Output
$75.27 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
87.7
Open weights
No
Full Claude Opus 4.5 page
xAI

Grok 4 Pro

Grok 4 Pro is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $19.00 per million input tokens and $77.72 per million output tokens, and averages 85.4 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.00 / 1M
Output
$77.72 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
85.4
Open weights
No
Full Grok 4 Pro page

Specification comparison

SpecClaude Opus 4.5Grok 4 ProEdge
Input price / 1M$19.42$19.00B
Output price / 1M$75.27$77.72A
Context window400,0001,000,000B
Max output4,096128,000B
Average score87.785.4A
Arena Elo1491.21487.5A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 wins 10, Grok 4 Pro wins 2, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Grok 4 ProGapWinner
MMLU-Pro87.084.92.1Claude Opus 4.5
GPQA Diamond81.779.22.5Claude Opus 4.5
SWE-bench Verified77.174.72.4Claude Opus 4.5
HumanEval93.789.74.0Claude Opus 4.5
MATH-50093.792.31.4Claude Opus 4.5
AIME 202589.885.44.4Claude Opus 4.5
LiveCodeBench85.077.87.2Claude Opus 4.5
IFEval92.591.31.2Claude Opus 4.5
TruthfulQA88.186.02.1Claude Opus 4.5
HellaSwag92.492.80.4Grok 4 Pro
MMMU84.284.90.7Grok 4 Pro
Arena Elo1491.21487.53.7Claude Opus 4.5

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude Opus 4.5 costs about $33.38 per million tokens and Grok 4 Pro costs about $33.68. Claude Opus 4.5 is roughly 1% cheaper than Grok 4 Pro. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Grok 4 Pro has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 400,000 for Claude Opus 4.5. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 wins 10, Grok 4 Pro wins 2, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Claude Opus 4.5 leads Grok 4 Pro by 2.3 points (87.7 versus 85.4).

The price picture favours Claude Opus 4.5. The context picture favours Grok 4 Pro. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Claude Opus 4.5 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

Choose Grok 4 Pro if

  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than Grok 4 Pro?

On the index average, Claude Opus 4.5 leads Grok 4 Pro by 2.3 points (87.7 versus 85.4). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude Opus 4.5 wins 10 benchmarks, Grok 4 Pro wins 2.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or Grok 4 Pro?

Claude Opus 4.5 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $33.38 per million tokens, versus $33.68 for Grok 4 Pro.

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 4 Pro has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 has 400,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Claude Opus 4.5 is proprietary; Grok 4 Pro is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Claude Opus 4.5 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons