Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Claude Opus 4.5 vs o4 Max: which model should you choose?

We compared Claude Opus 4.5 and o4 Max on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 has the stronger average benchmark score; Claude Opus 4.5 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.5

Claude Opus 4.5 is a frontier model from Anthropic. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $19.42 per million input tokens and $75.27 per million output tokens, and averages 87.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.42 / 1M
Output
$75.27 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
87.7
Open weights
No
Full Claude Opus 4.5 page
OpenAI

o4 Max

o4 Max is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $19.51 per million input tokens and $93.98 per million output tokens, and averages 86.2 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.51 / 1M
Output
$93.98 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
86.2
Open weights
No
Full o4 Max page

Specification comparison

SpecClaude Opus 4.5o4 MaxEdge
Input price / 1M$19.42$19.51A
Output price / 1M$75.27$93.98A
Context window400,0002,000,000B
Max output4,09665,536B
Average score87.786.2A
Arena Elo1491.21486.0A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 wins 10, o4 Max wins 2, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5o4 MaxGapWinner
MMLU-Pro87.086.30.7Claude Opus 4.5
GPQA Diamond81.780.11.6Claude Opus 4.5
SWE-bench Verified77.179.82.7o4 Max
HumanEval93.794.60.9o4 Max
MATH-50093.790.63.1Claude Opus 4.5
AIME 202589.884.85.0Claude Opus 4.5
LiveCodeBench85.080.64.4Claude Opus 4.5
IFEval92.591.11.4Claude Opus 4.5
TruthfulQA88.187.11.0Claude Opus 4.5
HellaSwag92.491.70.7Claude Opus 4.5
MMMU84.281.92.3Claude Opus 4.5
Arena Elo1491.21486.05.2Claude Opus 4.5

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude Opus 4.5 costs about $33.38 per million tokens and o4 Max costs about $38.13. Claude Opus 4.5 is roughly 12% cheaper than o4 Max. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

o4 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 400,000 for Claude Opus 4.5. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.5 wins 10, o4 Max wins 2, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Claude Opus 4.5 leads o4 Max by 1.5 points (87.7 versus 86.2).

The price picture favours Claude Opus 4.5. The context picture favours o4 Max. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Claude Opus 4.5 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

Choose o4 Max if

  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 65,536-token output limit.

FAQ

Is Claude Opus 4.5 better than o4 Max?

On the index average, Claude Opus 4.5 leads o4 Max by 1.5 points (87.7 versus 86.2). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude Opus 4.5 wins 10 benchmarks, o4 Max wins 2.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or o4 Max?

Claude Opus 4.5 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $33.38 per million tokens, versus $38.13 for o4 Max.

Which has the larger context window?

o4 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 has 400,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Claude Opus 4.5 is proprietary; o4 Max is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Claude Opus 4.5 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons