Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max vs Gemini 3 Pro Turbo: which model should you choose?

We compared Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max and Gemini 3 Pro Turbo on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max has the stronger average benchmark score; Gemini 3 Pro Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max is a frontier model from Anthropic. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $19.90 per million input tokens and $95.47 per million output tokens, and averages 87.2 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.90 / 1M
Output
$95.47 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
87.2
Open weights
No
Full Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max page
Google DeepMind

Gemini 3 Pro Turbo

Gemini 3 Pro Turbo is a frontier model from Google DeepMind. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $19.62 per million input tokens and $89.91 per million output tokens, and averages 86.4 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.62 / 1M
Output
$89.91 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
86.4
Open weights
No
Full Gemini 3 Pro Turbo page

Specification comparison

SpecClaude Sonnet 4.5 MaxGemini 3 Pro TurboEdge
Input price / 1M$19.90$19.62B
Output price / 1M$95.47$89.91B
Context window1,000,000400,000A
Max output65,53616,384A
Average score87.286.4A
Arena Elo1474.91494.9B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max wins 7, Gemini 3 Pro Turbo wins 5, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 MaxGemini 3 Pro TurboGapWinner
MMLU-Pro86.185.60.5Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max
GPQA Diamond84.481.03.4Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max
SWE-bench Verified80.277.42.8Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max
HumanEval92.490.32.1Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max
MATH-50092.892.40.4Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max
AIME 202585.482.82.6Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max
LiveCodeBench82.882.70.1Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max
IFEval92.993.40.5Gemini 3 Pro Turbo
TruthfulQA87.387.80.5Gemini 3 Pro Turbo
HellaSwag93.194.61.5Gemini 3 Pro Turbo
MMMU82.082.70.7Gemini 3 Pro Turbo
Arena Elo1474.91494.920.0Gemini 3 Pro Turbo

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max costs about $38.79 per million tokens and Gemini 3 Pro Turbo costs about $37.19. Gemini 3 Pro Turbo is roughly 4% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 400,000 for Gemini 3 Pro Turbo. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max wins 7, Gemini 3 Pro Turbo wins 5, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max leads Gemini 3 Pro Turbo by 0.8 points (87.2 versus 86.4).

The price picture favours Gemini 3 Pro Turbo. The context picture favours Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max for quality-sensitive work and Gemini 3 Pro Turbo for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 65,536-token output limit.

Choose Gemini 3 Pro Turbo if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

FAQ

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max better than Gemini 3 Pro Turbo?

On the index average, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max leads Gemini 3 Pro Turbo by 0.8 points (87.2 versus 86.4). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max wins 7 benchmarks, Gemini 3 Pro Turbo wins 5.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max or Gemini 3 Pro Turbo?

Gemini 3 Pro Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $37.19 per million tokens, versus $38.79 for Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max.

Which has the larger context window?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3 Pro Turbo has 400,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max is proprietary; Gemini 3 Pro Turbo is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max for quality-sensitive work and Gemini 3 Pro Turbo for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons