Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning vs o4 Turbo: which model should you choose?
We compared Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning and o4 Turbo on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning has the stronger average benchmark score; Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning is a frontier model from Anthropic. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $19.48 per million input tokens and $68.20 per million output tokens, and averages 87.7 across the index's benchmark suite.
- Input
- $19.48 / 1M
- Output
- $68.20 / 1M
- Context
- 400,000
- Avg score
- 87.7
- Open weights
- No
o4 Turbo
o4 Turbo is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $19.34 per million input tokens and $82.19 per million output tokens, and averages 86.6 across the index's benchmark suite.
- Input
- $19.34 / 1M
- Output
- $82.19 / 1M
- Context
- 2,000,000
- Avg score
- 86.6
- Open weights
- No
Specification comparison
| Spec | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning | o4 Turbo | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $19.48 | $19.34 | B |
| Output price / 1M | $68.20 | $82.19 | A |
| Context window | 400,000 | 2,000,000 | B |
| Max output | 8,192 | 8,192 | Tie |
| Average score | 87.7 | 86.6 | A |
| Arena Elo | 1486.5 | 1468.1 | A |
| Open weights | No | No | Tie |
Benchmark comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning wins 7, o4 Turbo wins 5, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning | o4 Turbo | Gap | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 87.6 | 88.1 | 0.5 | o4 Turbo |
| GPQA Diamond | 85.2 | 84.8 | 0.4 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning |
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.6 | 78.4 | 1.2 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning |
| HumanEval | 90.3 | 91.0 | 0.7 | o4 Turbo |
| MATH-500 | 89.7 | 91.7 | 2.0 | o4 Turbo |
| AIME 2025 | 87.3 | 85.9 | 1.4 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning |
| LiveCodeBench | 85.1 | 80.1 | 5.0 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning |
| IFEval | 91.9 | 92.6 | 0.7 | o4 Turbo |
| TruthfulQA | 87.6 | 88.8 | 1.2 | o4 Turbo |
| HellaSwag | 95.2 | 91.3 | 3.9 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning |
| MMMU | 85.2 | 79.6 | 5.6 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning |
| Arena Elo | 1486.5 | 1468.1 | 18.4 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning |
Price analysis
On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning costs about $31.66 per million tokens and o4 Turbo costs about $35.05. Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning is roughly 10% cheaper than o4 Turbo. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.
o4 Turbo has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 400,000 for Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.
Verdict
Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning wins 7, o4 Turbo wins 5, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning leads o4 Turbo by 1.1 points (87.7 versus 86.6).
The price picture favours Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning. The context picture favours o4 Turbo. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.
If you need a single default, start with Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning if
- You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
- Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
Choose o4 Turbo if
- You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.
FAQ
Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning better than o4 Turbo?
On the index average, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning leads o4 Turbo by 1.1 points (87.7 versus 86.6). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning wins 7 benchmarks, o4 Turbo wins 5.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning or o4 Turbo?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $31.66 per million tokens, versus $35.05 for o4 Turbo.
Which has the larger context window?
o4 Turbo has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning has 400,000 tokens.
Are these models open weights?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning is proprietary; o4 Turbo is proprietary.
Which should I choose for production?
If you need a single default, start with Claude Sonnet 4.5 Reasoning for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.