Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo: which model should you choose?

We compared Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the stronger average benchmark score; Claude Sonnet 4.5 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is a frontier model from Anthropic. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $17.84 per million input tokens and $70.50 per million output tokens, and averages 86.0 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.84 / 1M
Output
$70.50 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
86.0
Open weights
No
Full Claude Sonnet 4.5 page
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo is a frontier model from Anthropic. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $18.37 per million input tokens and $81.65 per million output tokens, and averages 85.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$18.37 / 1M
Output
$81.65 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
85.9
Open weights
No
Full Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo page

Specification comparison

SpecClaude Sonnet 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5 TurboEdge
Input price / 1M$17.84$18.37A
Output price / 1M$70.50$81.65A
Context window400,0001,000,000B
Max output128,00065,536A
Average score86.085.9A
Arena Elo1478.21461.7A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 wins 4, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo wins 8, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5 TurboGapWinner
MMLU-Pro88.087.20.8Claude Sonnet 4.5
GPQA Diamond82.683.71.1Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo
SWE-bench Verified74.275.21.0Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo
HumanEval92.790.42.3Claude Sonnet 4.5
MATH-50087.088.01.0Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo
AIME 202586.387.81.5Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo
LiveCodeBench82.578.93.6Claude Sonnet 4.5
IFEval91.191.40.3Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo
TruthfulQA87.287.70.5Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo
HellaSwag93.093.90.9Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo
MMMU80.981.10.2Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo
Arena Elo1478.21461.716.5Claude Sonnet 4.5

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs about $31.00 per million tokens and Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo costs about $34.19. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is roughly 9% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 400,000 for Claude Sonnet 4.5. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4.5 wins 4, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo wins 8, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo by 0.1 points (86.0 versus 85.9).

The price picture favours Claude Sonnet 4.5. The context picture favours Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Claude Sonnet 4.5 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo if

  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.

FAQ

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo?

On the index average, Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo by 0.1 points (86.0 versus 85.9). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Claude Sonnet 4.5 wins 4 benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo wins 8.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $31.00 per million tokens, versus $34.19 for Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo.

Which has the larger context window?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 400,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is proprietary; Claude Sonnet 4.5 Turbo is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Claude Sonnet 4.5 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons