Head-to-head · multimodal vs multimodal

Command A Max vs ERNIE 4.5 Max: which model should you choose?

We compared Command A Max and ERNIE 4.5 Max on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. ERNIE 4.5 Max has the stronger average benchmark score; ERNIE 4.5 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Cohere

Command A Max

Command A Max is a multimodal model from Cohere. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $14.28 per million input tokens and $70.22 per million output tokens, and averages 79.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$14.28 / 1M
Output
$70.22 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
79.9
Open weights
No
Full Command A Max page
Baidu

ERNIE 4.5 Max

ERNIE 4.5 Max is a multimodal model from Baidu. It offers a 128,000-token context window, costs $14.41 per million input tokens and $53.71 per million output tokens, and averages 80.6 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$14.41 / 1M
Output
$53.71 / 1M
Context
128,000
Avg score
80.6
Open weights
No
Full ERNIE 4.5 Max page

Specification comparison

SpecCommand A MaxERNIE 4.5 MaxEdge
Input price / 1M$14.28$14.41A
Output price / 1M$70.22$53.71B
Context window400,000128,000A
Max output8,19265,536B
Average score79.980.6B
Arena Elo1443.71423.7A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Command A Max wins 5, ERNIE 4.5 Max wins 7, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkCommand A MaxERNIE 4.5 MaxGapWinner
MMLU-Pro84.380.83.5Command A Max
GPQA Diamond74.576.41.9ERNIE 4.5 Max
SWE-bench Verified69.768.90.8Command A Max
HumanEval83.487.74.3ERNIE 4.5 Max
MATH-50085.784.21.5Command A Max
AIME 202577.279.52.3ERNIE 4.5 Max
LiveCodeBench73.173.00.1Command A Max
IFEval86.787.10.4ERNIE 4.5 Max
TruthfulQA82.283.61.4ERNIE 4.5 Max
HellaSwag87.187.70.6ERNIE 4.5 Max
MMMU74.678.13.5ERNIE 4.5 Max
Arena Elo1443.71423.720.0Command A Max

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Command A Max costs about $28.27 per million tokens and ERNIE 4.5 Max costs about $24.23. ERNIE 4.5 Max is roughly 14% cheaper than Command A Max. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Command A Max has the larger context window at 400,000 tokens, compared with 128,000 for ERNIE 4.5 Max. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Command A Max wins 5, ERNIE 4.5 Max wins 7, and 0 are tied. On the index average, ERNIE 4.5 Max leads Command A Max by 0.7 points (80.6 versus 79.9).

The price picture favours ERNIE 4.5 Max. The context picture favours Command A Max. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with ERNIE 4.5 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Command A Max if

  • You need the larger 400,000-token context window.

Choose ERNIE 4.5 Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 65,536-token output limit.

FAQ

Is Command A Max better than ERNIE 4.5 Max?

On the index average, ERNIE 4.5 Max leads Command A Max by 0.7 points (80.6 versus 79.9). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Command A Max wins 5 benchmarks, ERNIE 4.5 Max wins 7.

Which is cheaper, Command A Max or ERNIE 4.5 Max?

ERNIE 4.5 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $24.23 per million tokens, versus $28.27 for Command A Max.

Which has the larger context window?

Command A Max has the larger context window at 400,000 tokens. ERNIE 4.5 Max has 128,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Command A Max is proprietary; ERNIE 4.5 Max is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with ERNIE 4.5 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons