Head-to-head · multimodal vs multimodal

Command A Max vs MiniMax-M2: which model should you choose?

We compared Command A Max and MiniMax-M2 on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. MiniMax-M2 has the stronger average benchmark score; MiniMax-M2 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Cohere

Command A Max

Command A Max is a multimodal model from Cohere. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $14.28 per million input tokens and $70.22 per million output tokens, and averages 79.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$14.28 / 1M
Output
$70.22 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
79.9
Open weights
No
Full Command A Max page
MiniMax

MiniMax-M2

MiniMax-M2 is a multimodal model from MiniMax. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $5.19 per million input tokens and $22.73 per million output tokens, and averages 80.6 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$5.19 / 1M
Output
$22.73 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
80.6
Open weights
Yes
Full MiniMax-M2 page

Specification comparison

SpecCommand A MaxMiniMax-M2Edge
Input price / 1M$14.28$5.19B
Output price / 1M$70.22$22.73B
Context window400,000200,000A
Max output8,19265,536B
Average score79.980.6B
Arena Elo1443.71423.8A
Open weightsNoYesB

Benchmark comparison

Command A Max wins 4, MiniMax-M2 wins 8, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkCommand A MaxMiniMax-M2GapWinner
MMLU-Pro84.381.82.5Command A Max
GPQA Diamond74.575.40.9MiniMax-M2
SWE-bench Verified69.769.90.2MiniMax-M2
HumanEval83.488.04.6MiniMax-M2
MATH-50085.782.33.4Command A Max
AIME 202577.278.10.9MiniMax-M2
LiveCodeBench73.173.40.3MiniMax-M2
IFEval86.786.10.6Command A Max
TruthfulQA82.283.51.3MiniMax-M2
HellaSwag87.190.43.3MiniMax-M2
MMMU74.678.03.4MiniMax-M2
Arena Elo1443.71423.819.9Command A Max

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Command A Max costs about $28.27 per million tokens and MiniMax-M2 costs about $9.57. MiniMax-M2 is roughly 66% cheaper than Command A Max. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Command A Max has the larger context window at 400,000 tokens, compared with 200,000 for MiniMax-M2. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Command A Max wins 4, MiniMax-M2 wins 8, and 0 are tied. On the index average, MiniMax-M2 leads Command A Max by 0.7 points (80.6 versus 79.9).

The price picture favours MiniMax-M2. The context picture favours Command A Max. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with MiniMax-M2 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Command A Max if

  • You need the larger 400,000-token context window.

Choose MiniMax-M2 if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 65,536-token output limit.
  • You need open weights for self-hosting or fine-tuning.

FAQ

Is Command A Max better than MiniMax-M2?

On the index average, MiniMax-M2 leads Command A Max by 0.7 points (80.6 versus 79.9). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Command A Max wins 4 benchmarks, MiniMax-M2 wins 8.

Which is cheaper, Command A Max or MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $9.57 per million tokens, versus $28.27 for Command A Max.

Which has the larger context window?

Command A Max has the larger context window at 400,000 tokens. MiniMax-M2 has 200,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Command A Max is proprietary; MiniMax-M2 is open weights.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with MiniMax-M2 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons