Head-to-head · multimodal vs multimodal

Command A Pro vs MiniMax-M2: which model should you choose?

We compared Command A Pro and MiniMax-M2 on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Command A Pro has the stronger average benchmark score; MiniMax-M2 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Cohere

Command A Pro

Command A Pro is a multimodal model from Cohere. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $14.28 per million input tokens and $68.05 per million output tokens, and averages 81.3 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$14.28 / 1M
Output
$68.05 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
81.3
Open weights
No
Full Command A Pro page
MiniMax

MiniMax-M2

MiniMax-M2 is a multimodal model from MiniMax. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $5.19 per million input tokens and $22.73 per million output tokens, and averages 80.6 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$5.19 / 1M
Output
$22.73 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
80.6
Open weights
Yes
Full MiniMax-M2 page

Specification comparison

SpecCommand A ProMiniMax-M2Edge
Input price / 1M$14.28$5.19B
Output price / 1M$68.05$22.73B
Context window200,000200,000Tie
Max output16,38465,536B
Average score81.380.6A
Arena Elo1434.61423.8A
Open weightsNoYesB

Benchmark comparison

Command A Pro wins 7, MiniMax-M2 wins 5, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkCommand A ProMiniMax-M2GapWinner
MMLU-Pro81.381.80.5MiniMax-M2
GPQA Diamond79.175.43.7Command A Pro
SWE-bench Verified71.269.91.3Command A Pro
HumanEval87.588.00.5MiniMax-M2
MATH-50083.182.30.8Command A Pro
AIME 202578.278.10.1Command A Pro
LiveCodeBench74.073.40.6Command A Pro
IFEval89.086.12.9Command A Pro
TruthfulQA83.383.50.2MiniMax-M2
HellaSwag90.190.40.3MiniMax-M2
MMMU77.278.00.8MiniMax-M2
Arena Elo1434.61423.810.8Command A Pro

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Command A Pro costs about $27.72 per million tokens and MiniMax-M2 costs about $9.57. MiniMax-M2 is roughly 65% cheaper than Command A Pro. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Both models list a 200,000-token context window. That is enough for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Command A Pro wins 7, MiniMax-M2 wins 5, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Command A Pro leads MiniMax-M2 by 0.7 points (81.3 versus 80.6).

The price picture favours MiniMax-M2. The context picture is effectively a tie. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Command A Pro for quality-sensitive work and MiniMax-M2 for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose Command A Pro if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.

Choose MiniMax-M2 if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 65,536-token output limit.
  • You need open weights for self-hosting or fine-tuning.

FAQ

Is Command A Pro better than MiniMax-M2?

On the index average, Command A Pro leads MiniMax-M2 by 0.7 points (81.3 versus 80.6). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Command A Pro wins 7 benchmarks, MiniMax-M2 wins 5.

Which is cheaper, Command A Pro or MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $9.57 per million tokens, versus $27.72 for Command A Pro.

Which has the larger context window?

Both models list a 200,000-token context window.

Are these models open weights?

Command A Pro is proprietary; MiniMax-M2 is open weights.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Command A Pro for quality-sensitive work and MiniMax-M2 for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons