Head-to-head · multimodal vs multimodal

DeepSeek-R1 Base vs MiniMax-M2 Chat: which model should you choose?

We compared DeepSeek-R1 Base and MiniMax-M2 Chat on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. MiniMax-M2 Chat has the stronger average benchmark score; MiniMax-M2 Chat is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek-R1 Base

DeepSeek-R1 Base is a multimodal model from DeepSeek. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $5.05 per million input tokens and $26.24 per million output tokens, and averages 80.1 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$5.05 / 1M
Output
$26.24 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
80.1
Open weights
Yes
Full DeepSeek-R1 Base page
MiniMax

MiniMax-M2 Chat

MiniMax-M2 Chat is a multimodal model from MiniMax. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $5.02 per million input tokens and $18.95 per million output tokens, and averages 80.2 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$5.02 / 1M
Output
$18.95 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
80.2
Open weights
Yes
Full MiniMax-M2 Chat page

Specification comparison

SpecDeepSeek-R1 BaseMiniMax-M2 ChatEdge
Input price / 1M$5.05$5.02B
Output price / 1M$26.24$18.95B
Context window400,000200,000A
Max output65,5368,192A
Average score80.180.2B
Arena Elo1442.91443.0B
Open weightsYesYesTie

Benchmark comparison

DeepSeek-R1 Base wins 5, MiniMax-M2 Chat wins 7, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1 BaseMiniMax-M2 ChatGapWinner
MMLU-Pro81.084.33.3MiniMax-M2 Chat
GPQA Diamond76.277.81.6MiniMax-M2 Chat
SWE-bench Verified71.266.44.8DeepSeek-R1 Base
HumanEval83.484.20.8MiniMax-M2 Chat
MATH-50084.986.01.1MiniMax-M2 Chat
AIME 202573.878.34.5MiniMax-M2 Chat
LiveCodeBench76.070.45.6DeepSeek-R1 Base
IFEval88.288.00.2DeepSeek-R1 Base
TruthfulQA82.280.31.9DeepSeek-R1 Base
HellaSwag90.087.82.2DeepSeek-R1 Base
MMMU74.279.25.0MiniMax-M2 Chat
Arena Elo1442.91443.00.1MiniMax-M2 Chat

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, DeepSeek-R1 Base costs about $10.35 per million tokens and MiniMax-M2 Chat costs about $8.50. MiniMax-M2 Chat is roughly 18% cheaper than DeepSeek-R1 Base. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

DeepSeek-R1 Base has the larger context window at 400,000 tokens, compared with 200,000 for MiniMax-M2 Chat. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, DeepSeek-R1 Base wins 5, MiniMax-M2 Chat wins 7, and 0 are tied. On the index average, MiniMax-M2 Chat leads DeepSeek-R1 Base by 0.1 points (80.2 versus 80.1).

The price picture favours MiniMax-M2 Chat. The context picture favours DeepSeek-R1 Base. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with MiniMax-M2 Chat for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose DeepSeek-R1 Base if

  • You need the larger 400,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 65,536-token output limit.

Choose MiniMax-M2 Chat if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

FAQ

Is DeepSeek-R1 Base better than MiniMax-M2 Chat?

On the index average, MiniMax-M2 Chat leads DeepSeek-R1 Base by 0.1 points (80.2 versus 80.1). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. DeepSeek-R1 Base wins 5 benchmarks, MiniMax-M2 Chat wins 7.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-R1 Base or MiniMax-M2 Chat?

MiniMax-M2 Chat is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $8.50 per million tokens, versus $10.35 for DeepSeek-R1 Base.

Which has the larger context window?

DeepSeek-R1 Base has the larger context window at 400,000 tokens. MiniMax-M2 Chat has 200,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

DeepSeek-R1 Base is open weights; MiniMax-M2 Chat is open weights.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with MiniMax-M2 Chat for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons