Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

DeepSeek-R1 Instruct vs GPT-4.1 Turbo: which model should you choose?

We compared DeepSeek-R1 Instruct and GPT-4.1 Turbo on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. DeepSeek-R1 Instruct has the stronger average benchmark score; DeepSeek-R1 Instruct is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek-R1 Instruct

DeepSeek-R1 Instruct is a frontier model from DeepSeek. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $5.90 per million input tokens and $26.49 per million output tokens, and averages 83.1 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$5.90 / 1M
Output
$26.49 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
83.1
Open weights
Yes
Full DeepSeek-R1 Instruct page
OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Turbo

GPT-4.1 Turbo is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $16.12 per million input tokens and $69.91 per million output tokens, and averages 82.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.12 / 1M
Output
$69.91 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
82.9
Open weights
No
Full GPT-4.1 Turbo page

Specification comparison

SpecDeepSeek-R1 InstructGPT-4.1 TurboEdge
Input price / 1M$5.90$16.12A
Output price / 1M$26.49$69.91A
Context window1,000,0001,000,000Tie
Max output8,192128,000B
Average score83.182.9A
Arena Elo1447.71446.2A
Open weightsYesNoA

Benchmark comparison

DeepSeek-R1 Instruct wins 8, GPT-4.1 Turbo wins 4, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1 InstructGPT-4.1 TurboGapWinner
MMLU-Pro84.984.60.3DeepSeek-R1 Instruct
GPQA Diamond81.476.15.3DeepSeek-R1 Instruct
SWE-bench Verified72.474.72.3GPT-4.1 Turbo
HumanEval88.089.81.8GPT-4.1 Turbo
MATH-50086.286.90.7GPT-4.1 Turbo
AIME 202577.677.40.2DeepSeek-R1 Instruct
LiveCodeBench79.678.70.9DeepSeek-R1 Instruct
IFEval88.988.20.7DeepSeek-R1 Instruct
TruthfulQA82.287.04.8GPT-4.1 Turbo
HellaSwag91.190.01.1DeepSeek-R1 Instruct
MMMU81.578.53.0DeepSeek-R1 Instruct
Arena Elo1447.71446.21.5DeepSeek-R1 Instruct

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, DeepSeek-R1 Instruct costs about $11.05 per million tokens and GPT-4.1 Turbo costs about $29.57. DeepSeek-R1 Instruct is roughly 63% cheaper than GPT-4.1 Turbo. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Both models list a 1,000,000-token context window. That is enough for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, DeepSeek-R1 Instruct wins 8, GPT-4.1 Turbo wins 4, and 0 are tied. On the index average, DeepSeek-R1 Instruct leads GPT-4.1 Turbo by 0.2 points (83.1 versus 82.9).

The price picture favours DeepSeek-R1 Instruct. The context picture is effectively a tie. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with DeepSeek-R1 Instruct for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose DeepSeek-R1 Instruct if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need open weights for self-hosting or fine-tuning.

Choose GPT-4.1 Turbo if

  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

FAQ

Is DeepSeek-R1 Instruct better than GPT-4.1 Turbo?

On the index average, DeepSeek-R1 Instruct leads GPT-4.1 Turbo by 0.2 points (83.1 versus 82.9). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. DeepSeek-R1 Instruct wins 8 benchmarks, GPT-4.1 Turbo wins 4.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-R1 Instruct or GPT-4.1 Turbo?

DeepSeek-R1 Instruct is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $11.05 per million tokens, versus $29.57 for GPT-4.1 Turbo.

Which has the larger context window?

Both models list a 1,000,000-token context window.

Are these models open weights?

DeepSeek-R1 Instruct is open weights; GPT-4.1 Turbo is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with DeepSeek-R1 Instruct for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons