Head-to-head · multimodal vs multimodal

DeepSeek-R1 vs Gemini 3 Flash: which model should you choose?

We compared DeepSeek-R1 and Gemini 3 Flash on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash has the stronger average benchmark score; DeepSeek-R1 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek-R1

DeepSeek-R1 is a multimodal model from DeepSeek. It offers a 128,000-token context window, costs $5.83 per million input tokens and $25.23 per million output tokens, and averages 82.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$5.83 / 1M
Output
$25.23 / 1M
Context
128,000
Avg score
82.8
Open weights
Yes
Full DeepSeek-R1 page
Google DeepMind

Gemini 3 Flash

Gemini 3 Flash is a multimodal model from Google DeepMind. It offers a 128,000-token context window, costs $15.67 per million input tokens and $70.15 per million output tokens, and averages 83.6 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$15.67 / 1M
Output
$70.15 / 1M
Context
128,000
Avg score
83.6
Open weights
No
Full Gemini 3 Flash page

Specification comparison

SpecDeepSeek-R1Gemini 3 FlashEdge
Input price / 1M$5.83$15.67A
Output price / 1M$25.23$70.15A
Context window128,000128,000Tie
Max output4,09665,536B
Average score82.883.6B
Arena Elo1454.11450.7A
Open weightsYesNoA

Benchmark comparison

DeepSeek-R1 wins 5, Gemini 3 Flash wins 5, and 2 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1Gemini 3 FlashGapWinner
MMLU-Pro83.883.70.1DeepSeek-R1
GPQA Diamond77.880.32.5Gemini 3 Flash
SWE-bench Verified72.272.50.3Gemini 3 Flash
HumanEval86.486.20.2DeepSeek-R1
MATH-50089.189.00.1DeepSeek-R1
AIME 202581.184.53.4Gemini 3 Flash
LiveCodeBench77.479.31.9Gemini 3 Flash
IFEval91.091.00.0Tie
TruthfulQA82.984.81.9Gemini 3 Flash
HellaSwag89.889.80.0Tie
MMMU79.578.21.3DeepSeek-R1
Arena Elo1454.11450.73.4DeepSeek-R1

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, DeepSeek-R1 costs about $10.68 per million tokens and Gemini 3 Flash costs about $29.29. DeepSeek-R1 is roughly 64% cheaper than Gemini 3 Flash. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Both models list a 128,000-token context window. That is enough for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, DeepSeek-R1 wins 5, Gemini 3 Flash wins 5, and 2 are tied. On the index average, Gemini 3 Flash leads DeepSeek-R1 by 0.8 points (83.6 versus 82.8).

The price picture favours DeepSeek-R1. The context picture is effectively a tie. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Gemini 3 Flash for quality-sensitive work and DeepSeek-R1 for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose DeepSeek-R1 if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need open weights for self-hosting or fine-tuning.

Choose Gemini 3 Flash if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • You need the larger 65,536-token output limit.

FAQ

Is DeepSeek-R1 better than Gemini 3 Flash?

On the index average, Gemini 3 Flash leads DeepSeek-R1 by 0.8 points (83.6 versus 82.8). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. DeepSeek-R1 wins 5 benchmarks, Gemini 3 Flash wins 5.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-R1 or Gemini 3 Flash?

DeepSeek-R1 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $10.68 per million tokens, versus $29.29 for Gemini 3 Flash.

Which has the larger context window?

Both models list a 128,000-token context window.

Are these models open weights?

DeepSeek-R1 is open weights; Gemini 3 Flash is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Gemini 3 Flash for quality-sensitive work and DeepSeek-R1 for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons