Head-to-head · multimodal vs frontier

DeepSeek-R1 vs Grok 3 Reasoning: which model should you choose?

We compared DeepSeek-R1 and Grok 3 Reasoning on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Grok 3 Reasoning has the stronger average benchmark score; DeepSeek-R1 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek-R1

DeepSeek-R1 is a multimodal model from DeepSeek. It offers a 128,000-token context window, costs $5.83 per million input tokens and $25.23 per million output tokens, and averages 82.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$5.83 / 1M
Output
$25.23 / 1M
Context
128,000
Avg score
82.8
Open weights
Yes
Full DeepSeek-R1 page
xAI

Grok 3 Reasoning

Grok 3 Reasoning is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $16.07 per million input tokens and $74.65 per million output tokens, and averages 82.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.07 / 1M
Output
$74.65 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
82.9
Open weights
No
Full Grok 3 Reasoning page

Specification comparison

SpecDeepSeek-R1Grok 3 ReasoningEdge
Input price / 1M$5.83$16.07A
Output price / 1M$25.23$74.65A
Context window128,000200,000B
Max output4,09616,384B
Average score82.882.9B
Arena Elo1454.11448.0A
Open weightsYesNoA

Benchmark comparison

DeepSeek-R1 wins 7, Grok 3 Reasoning wins 5, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1Grok 3 ReasoningGapWinner
MMLU-Pro83.884.50.7Grok 3 Reasoning
GPQA Diamond77.877.30.5DeepSeek-R1
SWE-bench Verified72.274.01.8Grok 3 Reasoning
HumanEval86.488.52.1Grok 3 Reasoning
MATH-50089.190.21.1Grok 3 Reasoning
AIME 202581.178.22.9DeepSeek-R1
LiveCodeBench77.476.50.9DeepSeek-R1
IFEval91.090.20.8DeepSeek-R1
TruthfulQA82.983.40.5Grok 3 Reasoning
HellaSwag89.889.70.1DeepSeek-R1
MMMU79.579.40.1DeepSeek-R1
Arena Elo1454.11448.06.1DeepSeek-R1

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, DeepSeek-R1 costs about $10.68 per million tokens and Grok 3 Reasoning costs about $30.72. DeepSeek-R1 is roughly 65% cheaper than Grok 3 Reasoning. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Grok 3 Reasoning has the larger context window at 200,000 tokens, compared with 128,000 for DeepSeek-R1. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, DeepSeek-R1 wins 7, Grok 3 Reasoning wins 5, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Grok 3 Reasoning leads DeepSeek-R1 by 0.1 points (82.9 versus 82.8).

The price picture favours DeepSeek-R1. The context picture favours Grok 3 Reasoning. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Grok 3 Reasoning for quality-sensitive work and DeepSeek-R1 for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose DeepSeek-R1 if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need open weights for self-hosting or fine-tuning.

Choose Grok 3 Reasoning if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • You need the larger 200,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 16,384-token output limit.

FAQ

Is DeepSeek-R1 better than Grok 3 Reasoning?

On the index average, Grok 3 Reasoning leads DeepSeek-R1 by 0.1 points (82.9 versus 82.8). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. DeepSeek-R1 wins 7 benchmarks, Grok 3 Reasoning wins 5.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-R1 or Grok 3 Reasoning?

DeepSeek-R1 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $10.68 per million tokens, versus $30.72 for Grok 3 Reasoning.

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 3 Reasoning has the larger context window at 200,000 tokens. DeepSeek-R1 has 128,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

DeepSeek-R1 is open weights; Grok 3 Reasoning is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Grok 3 Reasoning for quality-sensitive work and DeepSeek-R1 for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons