Head-to-head · multimodal vs multimodal

DeepSeek-V3.2 Base vs MiniMax-M2 Chat: which model should you choose?

We compared DeepSeek-V3.2 Base and MiniMax-M2 Chat on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.2 Base and MiniMax-M2 Chat are effectively tied on the index average; MiniMax-M2 Chat is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek-V3.2 Base

DeepSeek-V3.2 Base is a multimodal model from DeepSeek. It offers a 128,000-token context window, costs $5.05 per million input tokens and $27.10 per million output tokens, and averages 80.2 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$5.05 / 1M
Output
$27.10 / 1M
Context
128,000
Avg score
80.2
Open weights
Yes
Full DeepSeek-V3.2 Base page
MiniMax

MiniMax-M2 Chat

MiniMax-M2 Chat is a multimodal model from MiniMax. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $5.02 per million input tokens and $18.95 per million output tokens, and averages 80.2 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$5.02 / 1M
Output
$18.95 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
80.2
Open weights
Yes
Full MiniMax-M2 Chat page

Specification comparison

SpecDeepSeek-V3.2 BaseMiniMax-M2 ChatEdge
Input price / 1M$5.05$5.02B
Output price / 1M$27.10$18.95B
Context window128,000200,000B
Max output128,0008,192A
Average score80.280.2Tie
Arena Elo1417.91443.0B
Open weightsYesYesTie

Benchmark comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2 Base wins 4, MiniMax-M2 Chat wins 7, and 1 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2 BaseMiniMax-M2 ChatGapWinner
MMLU-Pro84.384.30.0Tie
GPQA Diamond77.177.80.7MiniMax-M2 Chat
SWE-bench Verified69.166.42.7DeepSeek-V3.2 Base
HumanEval82.884.21.4MiniMax-M2 Chat
MATH-50083.786.02.3MiniMax-M2 Chat
AIME 202574.378.34.0MiniMax-M2 Chat
LiveCodeBench73.170.42.7DeepSeek-V3.2 Base
IFEval86.988.01.1MiniMax-M2 Chat
TruthfulQA83.580.33.2DeepSeek-V3.2 Base
HellaSwag90.287.82.4DeepSeek-V3.2 Base
MMMU76.779.22.5MiniMax-M2 Chat
Arena Elo1417.91443.025.1MiniMax-M2 Chat

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, DeepSeek-V3.2 Base costs about $10.56 per million tokens and MiniMax-M2 Chat costs about $8.50. MiniMax-M2 Chat is roughly 20% cheaper than DeepSeek-V3.2 Base. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

MiniMax-M2 Chat has the larger context window at 200,000 tokens, compared with 128,000 for DeepSeek-V3.2 Base. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, DeepSeek-V3.2 Base wins 4, MiniMax-M2 Chat wins 7, and 1 are tied. The two models are effectively tied on the index average at 80.2.

The price picture favours MiniMax-M2 Chat. The context picture favours MiniMax-M2 Chat. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with MiniMax-M2 Chat; it is cheaper on a blended basis and has the larger context window. Test it on your own traffic before committing.

Choose DeepSeek-V3.2 Base if

  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

Choose MiniMax-M2 Chat if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 200,000-token context window.

FAQ

Is DeepSeek-V3.2 Base better than MiniMax-M2 Chat?

The two models are effectively tied on the index average at 80.2. The better choice depends on price, context and your task. DeepSeek-V3.2 Base wins 4 benchmarks, MiniMax-M2 Chat wins 7.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2 Base or MiniMax-M2 Chat?

MiniMax-M2 Chat is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $8.50 per million tokens, versus $10.56 for DeepSeek-V3.2 Base.

Which has the larger context window?

MiniMax-M2 Chat has the larger context window at 200,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V3.2 Base has 128,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

DeepSeek-V3.2 Base is open weights; MiniMax-M2 Chat is open weights.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with MiniMax-M2 Chat; it is cheaper on a blended basis and has the larger context window. Test it on your own traffic before committing.

Related comparisons