Head-to-head · multimodal vs multimodal

DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat vs Grok 3: which model should you choose?

We compared DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat and Grok 3 on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Grok 3 has the stronger average benchmark score; DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat

DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat is a multimodal model from DeepSeek. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $5.80 per million input tokens and $26.43 per million output tokens, and averages 82.5 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$5.80 / 1M
Output
$26.43 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
82.5
Open weights
Yes
Full DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat page
xAI

Grok 3

Grok 3 is a multimodal model from xAI. It offers a 128,000-token context window, costs $15.84 per million input tokens and $70.31 per million output tokens, and averages 82.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$15.84 / 1M
Output
$70.31 / 1M
Context
128,000
Avg score
82.8
Open weights
No
Full Grok 3 page

Specification comparison

SpecDeepSeek-V3.2 ChatGrok 3Edge
Input price / 1M$5.80$15.84A
Output price / 1M$26.43$70.31A
Context window1,000,000128,000A
Max output8,1924,096A
Average score82.582.8B
Arena Elo1462.21447.2A
Open weightsYesNoA

Benchmark comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat wins 6, Grok 3 wins 6, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2 ChatGrok 3GapWinner
MMLU-Pro82.581.90.6DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat
GPQA Diamond78.080.02.0Grok 3
SWE-bench Verified69.672.63.0Grok 3
HumanEval87.985.32.6DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat
MATH-50090.288.71.5DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat
AIME 202581.081.10.1Grok 3
LiveCodeBench77.974.33.6DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat
IFEval88.691.02.4Grok 3
TruthfulQA86.385.40.9DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat
HellaSwag89.291.42.2Grok 3
MMMU76.079.13.1Grok 3
Arena Elo1462.21447.215.0DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat costs about $10.96 per million tokens and Grok 3 costs about $29.46. DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat is roughly 63% cheaper than Grok 3. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 128,000 for Grok 3. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat wins 6, Grok 3 wins 6, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Grok 3 leads DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat by 0.3 points (82.8 versus 82.5).

The price picture favours DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat. The context picture favours DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Grok 3 for quality-sensitive work and DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 8,192-token output limit.
  • You need open weights for self-hosting or fine-tuning.

Choose Grok 3 if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.

FAQ

Is DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat better than Grok 3?

On the index average, Grok 3 leads DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat by 0.3 points (82.8 versus 82.5). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat wins 6 benchmarks, Grok 3 wins 6.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat or Grok 3?

DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $10.96 per million tokens, versus $29.46 for Grok 3.

Which has the larger context window?

DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. Grok 3 has 128,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat is open weights; Grok 3 is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Grok 3 for quality-sensitive work and DeepSeek-V3.2 Chat for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons