DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo: which model should you choose?
We compared DeepSeek-V3.2 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.2 has the stronger average benchmark score; DeepSeek-V3.2 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.
DeepSeek-V3.2
DeepSeek-V3.2 is a frontier model from DeepSeek. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $5.88 per million input tokens and $24.70 per million output tokens, and averages 84.0 across the index's benchmark suite.
- Input
- $5.88 / 1M
- Output
- $24.70 / 1M
- Context
- 1,000,000
- Avg score
- 84.0
- Open weights
- Yes
Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo
Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo is a frontier model from Google DeepMind. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $16.32 per million input tokens and $72.61 per million output tokens, and averages 83.9 across the index's benchmark suite.
- Input
- $16.32 / 1M
- Output
- $72.61 / 1M
- Context
- 1,000,000
- Avg score
- 83.9
- Open weights
- No
Specification comparison
| Spec | DeepSeek-V3.2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $5.88 | $16.32 | A |
| Output price / 1M | $24.70 | $72.61 | A |
| Context window | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | Tie |
| Max output | 8,192 | 128,000 | B |
| Average score | 84.0 | 83.9 | A |
| Arena Elo | 1455.6 | 1464.0 | B |
| Open weights | Yes | No | A |
Benchmark comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2 wins 5, Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo wins 7, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo | Gap | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 86.9 | 82.9 | 4.0 | DeepSeek-V3.2 |
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7 | 81.7 | 2.0 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo |
| SWE-bench Verified | 74.4 | 71.4 | 3.0 | DeepSeek-V3.2 |
| HumanEval | 89.7 | 88.1 | 1.6 | DeepSeek-V3.2 |
| MATH-500 | 89.7 | 90.6 | 0.9 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo |
| AIME 2025 | 79.6 | 83.7 | 4.1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo |
| LiveCodeBench | 80.4 | 78.6 | 1.8 | DeepSeek-V3.2 |
| IFEval | 89.4 | 90.7 | 1.3 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo |
| TruthfulQA | 84.5 | 85.9 | 1.4 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo |
| HellaSwag | 90.2 | 91.2 | 1.0 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo |
| MMMU | 79.9 | 78.4 | 1.5 | DeepSeek-V3.2 |
| Arena Elo | 1455.6 | 1464.0 | 8.4 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo |
Price analysis
On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, DeepSeek-V3.2 costs about $10.59 per million tokens and Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo costs about $30.39. DeepSeek-V3.2 is roughly 65% cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.
Both models list a 1,000,000-token context window. That is enough for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.
Verdict
Across 12 shared benchmarks, DeepSeek-V3.2 wins 5, Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo wins 7, and 0 are tied. On the index average, DeepSeek-V3.2 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo by 0.1 points (84.0 versus 83.9).
The price picture favours DeepSeek-V3.2. The context picture is effectively a tie. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.
If you need a single default, start with DeepSeek-V3.2 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.
Choose DeepSeek-V3.2 if
- You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
- Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
- You need open weights for self-hosting or fine-tuning.
Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo if
- You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.
FAQ
Is DeepSeek-V3.2 better than Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo?
On the index average, DeepSeek-V3.2 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo by 0.1 points (84.0 versus 83.9). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. DeepSeek-V3.2 wins 5 benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo wins 7.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2 or Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo?
DeepSeek-V3.2 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $10.59 per million tokens, versus $30.39 for Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo.
Which has the larger context window?
Both models list a 1,000,000-token context window.
Are these models open weights?
DeepSeek-V3.2 is open weights; Gemini 2.5 Pro Turbo is proprietary.
Which should I choose for production?
If you need a single default, start with DeepSeek-V3.2 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.