Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Grok 3 Reasoning: which model should you choose?

We compared DeepSeek-V3.2 and Grok 3 Reasoning on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.2 has the stronger average benchmark score; DeepSeek-V3.2 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek-V3.2

DeepSeek-V3.2 is a frontier model from DeepSeek. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $5.88 per million input tokens and $24.70 per million output tokens, and averages 84.0 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$5.88 / 1M
Output
$24.70 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
84.0
Open weights
Yes
Full DeepSeek-V3.2 page
xAI

Grok 3 Reasoning

Grok 3 Reasoning is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $16.07 per million input tokens and $74.65 per million output tokens, and averages 82.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.07 / 1M
Output
$74.65 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
82.9
Open weights
No
Full Grok 3 Reasoning page

Specification comparison

SpecDeepSeek-V3.2Grok 3 ReasoningEdge
Input price / 1M$5.88$16.07A
Output price / 1M$24.70$74.65A
Context window1,000,000200,000A
Max output8,19216,384B
Average score84.082.9A
Arena Elo1455.61448.0A
Open weightsYesNoA

Benchmark comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2 wins 10, Grok 3 Reasoning wins 2, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2Grok 3 ReasoningGapWinner
MMLU-Pro86.984.52.4DeepSeek-V3.2
GPQA Diamond79.777.32.4DeepSeek-V3.2
SWE-bench Verified74.474.00.4DeepSeek-V3.2
HumanEval89.788.51.2DeepSeek-V3.2
MATH-50089.790.20.5Grok 3 Reasoning
AIME 202579.678.21.4DeepSeek-V3.2
LiveCodeBench80.476.53.9DeepSeek-V3.2
IFEval89.490.20.8Grok 3 Reasoning
TruthfulQA84.583.41.1DeepSeek-V3.2
HellaSwag90.289.70.5DeepSeek-V3.2
MMMU79.979.40.5DeepSeek-V3.2
Arena Elo1455.61448.07.6DeepSeek-V3.2

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, DeepSeek-V3.2 costs about $10.59 per million tokens and Grok 3 Reasoning costs about $30.72. DeepSeek-V3.2 is roughly 66% cheaper than Grok 3 Reasoning. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

DeepSeek-V3.2 has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 200,000 for Grok 3 Reasoning. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, DeepSeek-V3.2 wins 10, Grok 3 Reasoning wins 2, and 0 are tied. On the index average, DeepSeek-V3.2 leads Grok 3 Reasoning by 1.1 points (84.0 versus 82.9).

The price picture favours DeepSeek-V3.2. The context picture favours DeepSeek-V3.2. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with DeepSeek-V3.2 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose DeepSeek-V3.2 if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.
  • You need open weights for self-hosting or fine-tuning.

Choose Grok 3 Reasoning if

  • You need the larger 16,384-token output limit.

FAQ

Is DeepSeek-V3.2 better than Grok 3 Reasoning?

On the index average, DeepSeek-V3.2 leads Grok 3 Reasoning by 1.1 points (84.0 versus 82.9). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. DeepSeek-V3.2 wins 10 benchmarks, Grok 3 Reasoning wins 2.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2 or Grok 3 Reasoning?

DeepSeek-V3.2 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $10.59 per million tokens, versus $30.72 for Grok 3 Reasoning.

Which has the larger context window?

DeepSeek-V3.2 has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. Grok 3 Reasoning has 200,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

DeepSeek-V3.2 is open weights; Grok 3 Reasoning is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with DeepSeek-V3.2 for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons