Head-to-head · multimodal vs multimodal

Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo vs Qwen3 Instruct: which model should you choose?

We compared Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo and Qwen3 Instruct on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Qwen3 Instruct has the stronger average benchmark score; Qwen3 Instruct is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

ByteDance

Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo

Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo is a multimodal model from ByteDance. It offers a 128,000-token context window, costs $13.81 per million input tokens and $71.10 per million output tokens, and averages 79.4 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$13.81 / 1M
Output
$71.10 / 1M
Context
128,000
Avg score
79.4
Open weights
No
Full Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo page
Alibaba Cloud

Qwen3 Instruct

Qwen3 Instruct is a multimodal model from Alibaba Cloud. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $5.06 per million input tokens and $25.39 per million output tokens, and averages 79.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$5.06 / 1M
Output
$25.39 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
79.8
Open weights
Yes
Full Qwen3 Instruct page

Specification comparison

SpecDoubao 1.5 Pro TurboQwen3 InstructEdge
Input price / 1M$13.81$5.06B
Output price / 1M$71.10$25.39B
Context window128,0001,000,000B
Max output65,536128,000B
Average score79.479.8B
Arena Elo1433.01419.2A
Open weightsNoYesB

Benchmark comparison

Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo wins 5, Qwen3 Instruct wins 6, and 1 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkDoubao 1.5 Pro TurboQwen3 InstructGapWinner
MMLU-Pro80.380.30.0Tie
GPQA Diamond75.474.11.3Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo
SWE-bench Verified67.768.50.8Qwen3 Instruct
HumanEval85.085.10.1Qwen3 Instruct
MATH-50081.486.14.7Qwen3 Instruct
AIME 202575.678.52.9Qwen3 Instruct
LiveCodeBench72.371.11.2Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo
IFEval88.989.10.2Qwen3 Instruct
TruthfulQA80.979.71.2Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo
HellaSwag88.287.01.2Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo
MMMU77.678.71.1Qwen3 Instruct
Arena Elo1433.01419.213.8Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo costs about $28.13 per million tokens and Qwen3 Instruct costs about $10.14. Qwen3 Instruct is roughly 64% cheaper than Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Qwen3 Instruct has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 128,000 for Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo wins 5, Qwen3 Instruct wins 6, and 1 are tied. On the index average, Qwen3 Instruct leads Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo by 0.4 points (79.8 versus 79.4).

The price picture favours Qwen3 Instruct. The context picture favours Qwen3 Instruct. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Qwen3 Instruct for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo if

  • You prefer ByteDance's tooling or already use it.

Choose Qwen3 Instruct if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

FAQ

Is Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo better than Qwen3 Instruct?

On the index average, Qwen3 Instruct leads Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo by 0.4 points (79.8 versus 79.4). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo wins 5 benchmarks, Qwen3 Instruct wins 6.

Which is cheaper, Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo or Qwen3 Instruct?

Qwen3 Instruct is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $10.14 per million tokens, versus $28.13 for Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo.

Which has the larger context window?

Qwen3 Instruct has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo has 128,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Doubao 1.5 Pro Turbo is proprietary; Qwen3 Instruct is open weights.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Qwen3 Instruct for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons