Head-to-head · multimodal vs multimodal

ERNIE 4.5 Pro vs Reka Core Pro: which model should you choose?

We compared ERNIE 4.5 Pro and Reka Core Pro on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. ERNIE 4.5 Pro has the stronger average benchmark score; ERNIE 4.5 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Baidu

ERNIE 4.5 Pro

ERNIE 4.5 Pro is a multimodal model from Baidu. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $13.89 per million input tokens and $65.19 per million output tokens, and averages 80.5 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$13.89 / 1M
Output
$65.19 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
80.5
Open weights
No
Full ERNIE 4.5 Pro page
Reka AI

Reka Core Pro

Reka Core Pro is a multimodal model from Reka AI. It offers a 65,536-token context window, costs $13.44 per million input tokens and $69.38 per million output tokens, and averages 79.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$13.44 / 1M
Output
$69.38 / 1M
Context
65,536
Avg score
79.9
Open weights
No
Full Reka Core Pro page

Specification comparison

SpecERNIE 4.5 ProReka Core ProEdge
Input price / 1M$13.89$13.44B
Output price / 1M$65.19$69.38A
Context window1,000,00065,536A
Max output32,76865,536B
Average score80.579.9A
Arena Elo1414.31421.1B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

ERNIE 4.5 Pro wins 6, Reka Core Pro wins 5, and 1 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkERNIE 4.5 ProReka Core ProGapWinner
MMLU-Pro80.383.22.9Reka Core Pro
GPQA Diamond74.778.03.3Reka Core Pro
SWE-bench Verified66.566.80.3Reka Core Pro
HumanEval86.983.43.5ERNIE 4.5 Pro
MATH-50087.285.91.3ERNIE 4.5 Pro
AIME 202576.375.80.5ERNIE 4.5 Pro
LiveCodeBench76.471.84.6ERNIE 4.5 Pro
IFEval86.086.00.0Tie
TruthfulQA83.183.40.3Reka Core Pro
HellaSwag90.288.71.5ERNIE 4.5 Pro
MMMU78.476.42.0ERNIE 4.5 Pro
Arena Elo1414.31421.16.8Reka Core Pro

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, ERNIE 4.5 Pro costs about $26.71 per million tokens and Reka Core Pro costs about $27.42. ERNIE 4.5 Pro is roughly 3% cheaper than Reka Core Pro. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

ERNIE 4.5 Pro has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 65,536 for Reka Core Pro. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, ERNIE 4.5 Pro wins 6, Reka Core Pro wins 5, and 1 are tied. On the index average, ERNIE 4.5 Pro leads Reka Core Pro by 0.6 points (80.5 versus 79.9).

The price picture favours ERNIE 4.5 Pro. The context picture favours ERNIE 4.5 Pro. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with ERNIE 4.5 Pro for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose ERNIE 4.5 Pro if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.

Choose Reka Core Pro if

  • You need the larger 65,536-token output limit.

FAQ

Is ERNIE 4.5 Pro better than Reka Core Pro?

On the index average, ERNIE 4.5 Pro leads Reka Core Pro by 0.6 points (80.5 versus 79.9). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. ERNIE 4.5 Pro wins 6 benchmarks, Reka Core Pro wins 5.

Which is cheaper, ERNIE 4.5 Pro or Reka Core Pro?

ERNIE 4.5 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $26.71 per million tokens, versus $27.42 for Reka Core Pro.

Which has the larger context window?

ERNIE 4.5 Pro has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. Reka Core Pro has 65,536 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

ERNIE 4.5 Pro is proprietary; Reka Core Pro is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with ERNIE 4.5 Pro for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons