Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Gemini 2.5 Pro Max vs o3 Turbo: which model should you choose?

We compared Gemini 2.5 Pro Max and o3 Turbo on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Pro Max has the stronger average benchmark score; Gemini 2.5 Pro Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Google DeepMind

Gemini 2.5 Pro Max

Gemini 2.5 Pro Max is a frontier model from Google DeepMind. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $16.94 per million input tokens and $64.80 per million output tokens, and averages 84.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.94 / 1M
Output
$64.80 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
84.8
Open weights
No
Full Gemini 2.5 Pro Max page
OpenAI

o3 Turbo

o3 Turbo is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $16.63 per million input tokens and $83.71 per million output tokens, and averages 83.4 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.63 / 1M
Output
$83.71 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
83.4
Open weights
No
Full o3 Turbo page

Specification comparison

SpecGemini 2.5 Pro Maxo3 TurboEdge
Input price / 1M$16.94$16.63B
Output price / 1M$64.80$83.71A
Context window200,000200,000Tie
Max output65,5364,096A
Average score84.883.4A
Arena Elo1450.21456.2B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro Max wins 7, o3 Turbo wins 4, and 1 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro Maxo3 TurboGapWinner
MMLU-Pro86.782.74.0Gemini 2.5 Pro Max
GPQA Diamond79.877.72.1Gemini 2.5 Pro Max
SWE-bench Verified75.570.74.8Gemini 2.5 Pro Max
HumanEval87.087.40.4o3 Turbo
MATH-50091.690.61.0Gemini 2.5 Pro Max
AIME 202582.683.00.4o3 Turbo
LiveCodeBench79.980.70.8o3 Turbo
IFEval91.389.12.2Gemini 2.5 Pro Max
TruthfulQA85.583.61.9Gemini 2.5 Pro Max
HellaSwag92.991.81.1Gemini 2.5 Pro Max
MMMU79.779.70.0Tie
Arena Elo1450.21456.26.0o3 Turbo

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Gemini 2.5 Pro Max costs about $28.91 per million tokens and o3 Turbo costs about $33.40. Gemini 2.5 Pro Max is roughly 13% cheaper than o3 Turbo. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Both models list a 200,000-token context window. That is enough for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Pro Max wins 7, o3 Turbo wins 4, and 1 are tied. On the index average, Gemini 2.5 Pro Max leads o3 Turbo by 1.4 points (84.8 versus 83.4).

The price picture favours Gemini 2.5 Pro Max. The context picture is effectively a tie. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Gemini 2.5 Pro Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 65,536-token output limit.

Choose o3 Turbo if

  • You prefer OpenAI's tooling or already use it.

FAQ

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro Max better than o3 Turbo?

On the index average, Gemini 2.5 Pro Max leads o3 Turbo by 1.4 points (84.8 versus 83.4). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Gemini 2.5 Pro Max wins 7 benchmarks, o3 Turbo wins 4.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro Max or o3 Turbo?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $28.91 per million tokens, versus $33.40 for o3 Turbo.

Which has the larger context window?

Both models list a 200,000-token context window.

Are these models open weights?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Max is proprietary; o3 Turbo is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Gemini 2.5 Pro Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons