Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning vs Grok 3 Pro: which model should you choose?

We compared Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning and Grok 3 Pro on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning and Grok 3 Pro are effectively tied on the index average; Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Google DeepMind

Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning

Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning is a frontier model from Google DeepMind. It offers a 128,000-token context window, costs $16.81 per million input tokens and $67.95 per million output tokens, and averages 83.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.81 / 1M
Output
$67.95 / 1M
Context
128,000
Avg score
83.8
Open weights
No
Full Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning page
xAI

Grok 3 Pro

Grok 3 Pro is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $16.61 per million input tokens and $73.49 per million output tokens, and averages 83.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$16.61 / 1M
Output
$73.49 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
83.8
Open weights
No
Full Grok 3 Pro page

Specification comparison

SpecGemini 2.5 Pro ReasoningGrok 3 ProEdge
Input price / 1M$16.81$16.61B
Output price / 1M$67.95$73.49A
Context window128,000400,000B
Max output4,0964,096Tie
Average score83.883.8Tie
Arena Elo1472.11448.4A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning wins 6, Grok 3 Pro wins 6, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Pro ReasoningGrok 3 ProGapWinner
MMLU-Pro86.883.53.3Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning
GPQA Diamond80.081.31.3Grok 3 Pro
SWE-bench Verified71.271.40.2Grok 3 Pro
HumanEval86.789.93.2Grok 3 Pro
MATH-50087.987.00.9Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning
AIME 202584.285.51.3Grok 3 Pro
LiveCodeBench74.880.75.9Grok 3 Pro
IFEval90.888.62.2Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning
TruthfulQA84.084.60.6Grok 3 Pro
HellaSwag92.190.71.4Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning
MMMU82.878.93.9Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning
Arena Elo1472.11448.423.7Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning costs about $29.59 per million tokens and Grok 3 Pro costs about $30.83. Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning is roughly 4% cheaper than Grok 3 Pro. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Grok 3 Pro has the larger context window at 400,000 tokens, compared with 128,000 for Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning wins 6, Grok 3 Pro wins 6, and 0 are tied. The two models are effectively tied on the index average at 83.8.

The price picture favours Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning. The context picture favours Grok 3 Pro. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning if cost is the constraint and Grok 3 Pro if context is the constraint. Test both on a sample of your own traffic before committing.

Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

Choose Grok 3 Pro if

  • You need the larger 400,000-token context window.

FAQ

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning better than Grok 3 Pro?

The two models are effectively tied on the index average at 83.8. The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning wins 6 benchmarks, Grok 3 Pro wins 6.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning or Grok 3 Pro?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $29.59 per million tokens, versus $30.83 for Grok 3 Pro.

Which has the larger context window?

Grok 3 Pro has the larger context window at 400,000 tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning has 128,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning is proprietary; Grok 3 Pro is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Gemini 2.5 Pro Reasoning if cost is the constraint and Grok 3 Pro if context is the constraint. Test both on a sample of your own traffic before committing.

Related comparisons