Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Gemini 3 Flash Pro vs GPT-4.1 Pro: which model should you choose?

We compared Gemini 3 Flash Pro and GPT-4.1 Pro on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. GPT-4.1 Pro has the stronger average benchmark score; Gemini 3 Flash Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Google DeepMind

Gemini 3 Flash Pro

Gemini 3 Flash Pro is a frontier model from Google DeepMind. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $17.71 per million input tokens and $86.50 per million output tokens, and averages 84.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.71 / 1M
Output
$86.50 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
84.8
Open weights
No
Full Gemini 3 Flash Pro page
OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Pro

GPT-4.1 Pro is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $17.56 per million input tokens and $91.14 per million output tokens, and averages 85.2 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.56 / 1M
Output
$91.14 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
85.2
Open weights
No
Full GPT-4.1 Pro page

Specification comparison

SpecGemini 3 Flash ProGPT-4.1 ProEdge
Input price / 1M$17.71$17.56B
Output price / 1M$86.50$91.14A
Context window400,000400,000Tie
Max output4,0968,192B
Average score84.885.2B
Arena Elo1469.21449.6A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Gemini 3 Flash Pro wins 6, GPT-4.1 Pro wins 6, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash ProGPT-4.1 ProGapWinner
MMLU-Pro87.086.90.1Gemini 3 Flash Pro
GPQA Diamond77.778.20.5GPT-4.1 Pro
SWE-bench Verified73.377.34.0GPT-4.1 Pro
HumanEval89.991.92.0GPT-4.1 Pro
MATH-50091.888.83.0Gemini 3 Flash Pro
AIME 202579.982.82.9GPT-4.1 Pro
LiveCodeBench80.276.73.5Gemini 3 Flash Pro
IFEval92.892.20.6Gemini 3 Flash Pro
TruthfulQA86.287.71.5GPT-4.1 Pro
HellaSwag90.693.73.1GPT-4.1 Pro
MMMU83.081.51.5Gemini 3 Flash Pro
Arena Elo1469.21449.619.6Gemini 3 Flash Pro

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Gemini 3 Flash Pro costs about $34.91 per million tokens and GPT-4.1 Pro costs about $35.95. Gemini 3 Flash Pro is roughly 3% cheaper than GPT-4.1 Pro. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Both models list a 400,000-token context window. That is enough for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Gemini 3 Flash Pro wins 6, GPT-4.1 Pro wins 6, and 0 are tied. On the index average, GPT-4.1 Pro leads Gemini 3 Flash Pro by 0.4 points (85.2 versus 84.8).

The price picture favours Gemini 3 Flash Pro. The context picture is effectively a tie. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with GPT-4.1 Pro for quality-sensitive work and Gemini 3 Flash Pro for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose Gemini 3 Flash Pro if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

Choose GPT-4.1 Pro if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • You need the larger 8,192-token output limit.

FAQ

Is Gemini 3 Flash Pro better than GPT-4.1 Pro?

On the index average, GPT-4.1 Pro leads Gemini 3 Flash Pro by 0.4 points (85.2 versus 84.8). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Gemini 3 Flash Pro wins 6 benchmarks, GPT-4.1 Pro wins 6.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash Pro or GPT-4.1 Pro?

Gemini 3 Flash Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $34.91 per million tokens, versus $35.95 for GPT-4.1 Pro.

Which has the larger context window?

Both models list a 400,000-token context window.

Are these models open weights?

Gemini 3 Flash Pro is proprietary; GPT-4.1 Pro is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with GPT-4.1 Pro for quality-sensitive work and Gemini 3 Flash Pro for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons