Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Gemini 3 Flash Pro vs GPT-5.1 Vision: which model should you choose?

We compared Gemini 3 Flash Pro and GPT-5.1 Vision on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash Pro and GPT-5.1 Vision are effectively tied on the index average; GPT-5.1 Vision is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Google DeepMind

Gemini 3 Flash Pro

Gemini 3 Flash Pro is a frontier model from Google DeepMind. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $17.71 per million input tokens and $86.50 per million output tokens, and averages 84.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.71 / 1M
Output
$86.50 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
84.8
Open weights
No
Full Gemini 3 Flash Pro page
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Vision

GPT-5.1 Vision is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $17.76 per million input tokens and $80.59 per million output tokens, and averages 84.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.76 / 1M
Output
$80.59 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
84.8
Open weights
No
Full GPT-5.1 Vision page

Specification comparison

SpecGemini 3 Flash ProGPT-5.1 VisionEdge
Input price / 1M$17.71$17.76A
Output price / 1M$86.50$80.59B
Context window400,000400,000Tie
Max output4,09616,384B
Average score84.884.8Tie
Arena Elo1469.21462.4A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Gemini 3 Flash Pro wins 6, GPT-5.1 Vision wins 6, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash ProGPT-5.1 VisionGapWinner
MMLU-Pro87.085.51.5Gemini 3 Flash Pro
GPQA Diamond77.778.71.0GPT-5.1 Vision
SWE-bench Verified73.373.60.3GPT-5.1 Vision
HumanEval89.989.60.3Gemini 3 Flash Pro
MATH-50091.889.12.7Gemini 3 Flash Pro
AIME 202579.982.42.5GPT-5.1 Vision
LiveCodeBench80.277.82.4Gemini 3 Flash Pro
IFEval92.892.70.1Gemini 3 Flash Pro
TruthfulQA86.286.90.7GPT-5.1 Vision
HellaSwag90.692.11.5GPT-5.1 Vision
MMMU83.083.90.9GPT-5.1 Vision
Arena Elo1469.21462.46.8Gemini 3 Flash Pro

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Gemini 3 Flash Pro costs about $34.91 per million tokens and GPT-5.1 Vision costs about $33.47. GPT-5.1 Vision is roughly 4% cheaper than Gemini 3 Flash Pro. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Both models list a 400,000-token context window. That is enough for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Gemini 3 Flash Pro wins 6, GPT-5.1 Vision wins 6, and 0 are tied. The two models are effectively tied on the index average at 84.8.

The price picture favours GPT-5.1 Vision. The context picture is effectively a tie. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.1 Vision if cost is the constraint and Gemini 3 Flash Pro if context is the constraint. Test both on a sample of your own traffic before committing.

Choose Gemini 3 Flash Pro if

  • You prefer Google DeepMind's tooling or already use it.

Choose GPT-5.1 Vision if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 16,384-token output limit.

FAQ

Is Gemini 3 Flash Pro better than GPT-5.1 Vision?

The two models are effectively tied on the index average at 84.8. The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Gemini 3 Flash Pro wins 6 benchmarks, GPT-5.1 Vision wins 6.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash Pro or GPT-5.1 Vision?

GPT-5.1 Vision is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $33.47 per million tokens, versus $34.91 for Gemini 3 Flash Pro.

Which has the larger context window?

Both models list a 400,000-token context window.

Are these models open weights?

Gemini 3 Flash Pro is proprietary; GPT-5.1 Vision is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.1 Vision if cost is the constraint and Gemini 3 Flash Pro if context is the constraint. Test both on a sample of your own traffic before committing.

Related comparisons