Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Gemini 3 Flash Turbo vs o4 Vision: which model should you choose?

We compared Gemini 3 Flash Turbo and o4 Vision on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. o4 Vision has the stronger average benchmark score; Gemini 3 Flash Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Google DeepMind

Gemini 3 Flash Turbo

Gemini 3 Flash Turbo is a frontier model from Google DeepMind. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $17.07 per million input tokens and $69.05 per million output tokens, and averages 84.1 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.07 / 1M
Output
$69.05 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
84.1
Open weights
No
Full Gemini 3 Flash Turbo page
OpenAI

o4 Vision

o4 Vision is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $17.01 per million input tokens and $90.05 per million output tokens, and averages 84.5 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$17.01 / 1M
Output
$90.05 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
84.5
Open weights
No
Full o4 Vision page

Specification comparison

SpecGemini 3 Flash Turboo4 VisionEdge
Input price / 1M$17.07$17.01B
Output price / 1M$69.05$90.05A
Context window200,000200,000Tie
Max output16,3844,096A
Average score84.184.5B
Arena Elo1473.41473.2A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Gemini 3 Flash Turbo wins 6, o4 Vision wins 6, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash Turboo4 VisionGapWinner
MMLU-Pro87.984.23.7Gemini 3 Flash Turbo
GPQA Diamond77.580.93.4o4 Vision
SWE-bench Verified72.575.63.1o4 Vision
HumanEval90.688.91.7Gemini 3 Flash Turbo
MATH-50087.691.74.1o4 Vision
AIME 202581.380.40.9Gemini 3 Flash Turbo
LiveCodeBench78.581.32.8o4 Vision
IFEval88.989.10.2o4 Vision
TruthfulQA87.485.32.1Gemini 3 Flash Turbo
HellaSwag89.591.21.7o4 Vision
MMMU83.080.72.3Gemini 3 Flash Turbo
Arena Elo1473.41473.20.2Gemini 3 Flash Turbo

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Gemini 3 Flash Turbo costs about $30.06 per million tokens and o4 Vision costs about $35.27. Gemini 3 Flash Turbo is roughly 15% cheaper than o4 Vision. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Both models list a 200,000-token context window. That is enough for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Gemini 3 Flash Turbo wins 6, o4 Vision wins 6, and 0 are tied. On the index average, o4 Vision leads Gemini 3 Flash Turbo by 0.4 points (84.5 versus 84.1).

The price picture favours Gemini 3 Flash Turbo. The context picture is effectively a tie. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with o4 Vision for quality-sensitive work and Gemini 3 Flash Turbo for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose Gemini 3 Flash Turbo if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 16,384-token output limit.

Choose o4 Vision if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.

FAQ

Is Gemini 3 Flash Turbo better than o4 Vision?

On the index average, o4 Vision leads Gemini 3 Flash Turbo by 0.4 points (84.5 versus 84.1). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Gemini 3 Flash Turbo wins 6 benchmarks, o4 Vision wins 6.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash Turbo or o4 Vision?

Gemini 3 Flash Turbo is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $30.06 per million tokens, versus $35.27 for o4 Vision.

Which has the larger context window?

Both models list a 200,000-token context window.

Are these models open weights?

Gemini 3 Flash Turbo is proprietary; o4 Vision is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with o4 Vision for quality-sensitive work and Gemini 3 Flash Turbo for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons