Head-to-head · multimodal vs multimodal

Gemini 3 Flash Vision vs Llama 4 Maverick: which model should you choose?

We compared Gemini 3 Flash Vision and Llama 4 Maverick on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash Vision has the stronger average benchmark score; Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Google DeepMind

Gemini 3 Flash Vision

Gemini 3 Flash Vision is a multimodal model from Google DeepMind. It offers a 400,000-token context window, costs $15.06 per million input tokens and $82.14 per million output tokens, and averages 81.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$15.06 / 1M
Output
$82.14 / 1M
Context
400,000
Avg score
81.9
Open weights
No
Full Gemini 3 Flash Vision page
Meta AI

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick is a multimodal model from Meta AI. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $5.36 per million input tokens and $25.19 per million output tokens, and averages 81.6 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$5.36 / 1M
Output
$25.19 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
81.6
Open weights
Yes
Full Llama 4 Maverick page

Specification comparison

SpecGemini 3 Flash VisionLlama 4 MaverickEdge
Input price / 1M$15.06$5.36B
Output price / 1M$82.14$25.19B
Context window400,000200,000A
Max output32,7688,192A
Average score81.981.6A
Arena Elo1430.31447.0B
Open weightsNoYesB

Benchmark comparison

Gemini 3 Flash Vision wins 4, Llama 4 Maverick wins 8, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGemini 3 Flash VisionLlama 4 MaverickGapWinner
MMLU-Pro81.884.72.9Llama 4 Maverick
GPQA Diamond75.776.81.1Llama 4 Maverick
SWE-bench Verified71.471.80.4Llama 4 Maverick
HumanEval84.587.32.8Llama 4 Maverick
MATH-50087.582.74.8Gemini 3 Flash Vision
AIME 202582.479.62.8Gemini 3 Flash Vision
LiveCodeBench73.275.72.5Llama 4 Maverick
IFEval86.987.50.6Llama 4 Maverick
TruthfulQA85.582.62.9Gemini 3 Flash Vision
HellaSwag91.588.23.3Gemini 3 Flash Vision
MMMU80.380.40.1Llama 4 Maverick
Arena Elo1430.31447.016.7Llama 4 Maverick

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Gemini 3 Flash Vision costs about $31.83 per million tokens and Llama 4 Maverick costs about $10.32. Llama 4 Maverick is roughly 68% cheaper than Gemini 3 Flash Vision. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Gemini 3 Flash Vision has the larger context window at 400,000 tokens, compared with 200,000 for Llama 4 Maverick. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Gemini 3 Flash Vision wins 4, Llama 4 Maverick wins 8, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Gemini 3 Flash Vision leads Llama 4 Maverick by 0.3 points (81.9 versus 81.6).

The price picture favours Llama 4 Maverick. The context picture favours Gemini 3 Flash Vision. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Gemini 3 Flash Vision for quality-sensitive work and Llama 4 Maverick for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose Gemini 3 Flash Vision if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • You need the larger 400,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 32,768-token output limit.

Choose Llama 4 Maverick if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need open weights for self-hosting or fine-tuning.

FAQ

Is Gemini 3 Flash Vision better than Llama 4 Maverick?

On the index average, Gemini 3 Flash Vision leads Llama 4 Maverick by 0.3 points (81.9 versus 81.6). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Gemini 3 Flash Vision wins 4 benchmarks, Llama 4 Maverick wins 8.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash Vision or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $10.32 per million tokens, versus $31.83 for Gemini 3 Flash Vision.

Which has the larger context window?

Gemini 3 Flash Vision has the larger context window at 400,000 tokens. Llama 4 Maverick has 200,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Gemini 3 Flash Vision is proprietary; Llama 4 Maverick is open weights.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Gemini 3 Flash Vision for quality-sensitive work and Llama 4 Maverick for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons