Head-to-head · multimodal vs multimodal

Gemini 3 Flash vs GPT-4.1: which model should you choose?

We compared Gemini 3 Flash and GPT-4.1 on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Gemini 3 Flash has the stronger average benchmark score; GPT-4.1 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Google DeepMind

Gemini 3 Flash

Gemini 3 Flash is a multimodal model from Google DeepMind. It offers a 128,000-token context window, costs $15.67 per million input tokens and $70.15 per million output tokens, and averages 83.6 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$15.67 / 1M
Output
$70.15 / 1M
Context
128,000
Avg score
83.6
Open weights
No
Full Gemini 3 Flash page
OpenAI

GPT-4.1

GPT-4.1 is a multimodal model from OpenAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $15.71 per million input tokens and $64.52 per million output tokens, and averages 82.4 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$15.71 / 1M
Output
$64.52 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
82.4
Open weights
No
Full GPT-4.1 page

Specification comparison

SpecGemini 3 FlashGPT-4.1Edge
Input price / 1M$15.67$15.71A
Output price / 1M$70.15$64.52B
Context window128,0001,000,000B
Max output65,53616,384A
Average score83.682.4A
Arena Elo1450.71432.4A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Gemini 3 Flash wins 9, GPT-4.1 wins 3, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGemini 3 FlashGPT-4.1GapWinner
MMLU-Pro83.786.22.5GPT-4.1
GPQA Diamond80.376.14.2Gemini 3 Flash
SWE-bench Verified72.572.20.3Gemini 3 Flash
HumanEval86.288.32.1GPT-4.1
MATH-50089.086.82.2Gemini 3 Flash
AIME 202584.579.94.6Gemini 3 Flash
LiveCodeBench79.377.81.5Gemini 3 Flash
IFEval91.090.40.6Gemini 3 Flash
TruthfulQA84.881.83.0Gemini 3 Flash
HellaSwag89.890.30.5GPT-4.1
MMMU78.276.31.9Gemini 3 Flash
Arena Elo1450.71432.418.3Gemini 3 Flash

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Gemini 3 Flash costs about $29.29 per million tokens and GPT-4.1 costs about $27.91. GPT-4.1 is roughly 5% cheaper than Gemini 3 Flash. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

GPT-4.1 has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared with 128,000 for Gemini 3 Flash. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Gemini 3 Flash wins 9, GPT-4.1 wins 3, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Gemini 3 Flash leads GPT-4.1 by 1.2 points (83.6 versus 82.4).

The price picture favours GPT-4.1. The context picture favours GPT-4.1. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Gemini 3 Flash for quality-sensitive work and GPT-4.1 for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose Gemini 3 Flash if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • You need the larger 65,536-token output limit.

Choose GPT-4.1 if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 1,000,000-token context window.

FAQ

Is Gemini 3 Flash better than GPT-4.1?

On the index average, Gemini 3 Flash leads GPT-4.1 by 1.2 points (83.6 versus 82.4). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Gemini 3 Flash wins 9 benchmarks, GPT-4.1 wins 3.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash or GPT-4.1?

GPT-4.1 is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $27.91 per million tokens, versus $29.29 for Gemini 3 Flash.

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-4.1 has the larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3 Flash has 128,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Gemini 3 Flash is proprietary; GPT-4.1 is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Gemini 3 Flash for quality-sensitive work and GPT-4.1 for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons