Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Gemini 3 Pro Max vs GPT-5.1 Pro: which model should you choose?

We compared Gemini 3 Pro Max and GPT-5.1 Pro on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Gemini 3 Pro Max has the stronger average benchmark score; GPT-5.1 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Google DeepMind

Gemini 3 Pro Max

Gemini 3 Pro Max is a frontier model from Google DeepMind. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $20.57 per million input tokens and $112.92 per million output tokens, and averages 87.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$20.57 / 1M
Output
$112.92 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
87.9
Open weights
No
Full Gemini 3 Pro Max page
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Pro

GPT-5.1 Pro is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $19.77 per million input tokens and $100.32 per million output tokens, and averages 87.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.77 / 1M
Output
$100.32 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
87.8
Open weights
No
Full GPT-5.1 Pro page

Specification comparison

SpecGemini 3 Pro MaxGPT-5.1 ProEdge
Input price / 1M$20.57$19.77B
Output price / 1M$112.92$100.32B
Context window2,000,000200,000A
Max output128,00032,768A
Average score87.987.8A
Arena Elo1477.51490.0B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Gemini 3 Pro Max wins 5, GPT-5.1 Pro wins 7, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGemini 3 Pro MaxGPT-5.1 ProGapWinner
MMLU-Pro89.586.23.3Gemini 3 Pro Max
GPQA Diamond81.883.41.6GPT-5.1 Pro
SWE-bench Verified76.680.13.5GPT-5.1 Pro
HumanEval91.991.10.8Gemini 3 Pro Max
MATH-50092.195.13.0GPT-5.1 Pro
AIME 202589.690.61.0GPT-5.1 Pro
LiveCodeBench83.682.21.4Gemini 3 Pro Max
IFEval94.794.80.1GPT-5.1 Pro
TruthfulQA89.686.92.7Gemini 3 Pro Max
HellaSwag92.693.81.2GPT-5.1 Pro
MMMU84.481.62.8Gemini 3 Pro Max
Arena Elo1477.51490.012.5GPT-5.1 Pro

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Gemini 3 Pro Max costs about $43.66 per million tokens and GPT-5.1 Pro costs about $39.91. GPT-5.1 Pro is roughly 9% cheaper than Gemini 3 Pro Max. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Gemini 3 Pro Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 200,000 for GPT-5.1 Pro. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Gemini 3 Pro Max wins 5, GPT-5.1 Pro wins 7, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Gemini 3 Pro Max leads GPT-5.1 Pro by 0.1 points (87.9 versus 87.8).

The price picture favours GPT-5.1 Pro. The context picture favours Gemini 3 Pro Max. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Gemini 3 Pro Max for quality-sensitive work and GPT-5.1 Pro for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose Gemini 3 Pro Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 128,000-token output limit.

Choose GPT-5.1 Pro if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

FAQ

Is Gemini 3 Pro Max better than GPT-5.1 Pro?

On the index average, Gemini 3 Pro Max leads GPT-5.1 Pro by 0.1 points (87.9 versus 87.8). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Gemini 3 Pro Max wins 5 benchmarks, GPT-5.1 Pro wins 7.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Pro Max or GPT-5.1 Pro?

GPT-5.1 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $39.91 per million tokens, versus $43.66 for Gemini 3 Pro Max.

Which has the larger context window?

Gemini 3 Pro Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. GPT-5.1 Pro has 200,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Gemini 3 Pro Max is proprietary; GPT-5.1 Pro is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Gemini 3 Pro Max for quality-sensitive work and GPT-5.1 Pro for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons