Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Gemini 3 Pro Pro vs GPT-5.1 Max: which model should you choose?

We compared Gemini 3 Pro Pro and GPT-5.1 Max on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. GPT-5.1 Max has the stronger average benchmark score; GPT-5.1 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Google DeepMind

Gemini 3 Pro Pro

Gemini 3 Pro Pro is a frontier model from Google DeepMind. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $19.80 per million input tokens and $108.61 per million output tokens, and averages 87.3 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.80 / 1M
Output
$108.61 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
87.3
Open weights
No
Full Gemini 3 Pro Pro page
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Max

GPT-5.1 Max is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $20.50 per million input tokens and $103.98 per million output tokens, and averages 87.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$20.50 / 1M
Output
$103.98 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
87.9
Open weights
No
Full GPT-5.1 Max page

Specification comparison

SpecGemini 3 Pro ProGPT-5.1 MaxEdge
Input price / 1M$19.80$20.50A
Output price / 1M$108.61$103.98B
Context window200,0002,000,000B
Max output8,1928,192Tie
Average score87.387.9B
Arena Elo1484.41478.2A
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Gemini 3 Pro Pro wins 7, GPT-5.1 Max wins 5, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGemini 3 Pro ProGPT-5.1 MaxGapWinner
MMLU-Pro88.291.33.1GPT-5.1 Max
GPQA Diamond81.486.45.0GPT-5.1 Max
SWE-bench Verified75.775.60.1Gemini 3 Pro Pro
HumanEval95.092.22.8Gemini 3 Pro Pro
MATH-50091.691.30.3Gemini 3 Pro Pro
AIME 202588.088.80.8GPT-5.1 Max
LiveCodeBench83.180.22.9Gemini 3 Pro Pro
IFEval92.792.20.5Gemini 3 Pro Pro
TruthfulQA87.691.13.5GPT-5.1 Max
HellaSwag93.693.10.5Gemini 3 Pro Pro
MMMU83.285.11.9GPT-5.1 Max
Arena Elo1484.41478.26.2Gemini 3 Pro Pro

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Gemini 3 Pro Pro costs about $42.00 per million tokens and GPT-5.1 Max costs about $41.37. GPT-5.1 Max is roughly 2% cheaper than Gemini 3 Pro Pro. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

GPT-5.1 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 200,000 for Gemini 3 Pro Pro. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Gemini 3 Pro Pro wins 7, GPT-5.1 Max wins 5, and 0 are tied. On the index average, GPT-5.1 Max leads Gemini 3 Pro Pro by 0.6 points (87.9 versus 87.3).

The price picture favours GPT-5.1 Max. The context picture favours GPT-5.1 Max. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.1 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Gemini 3 Pro Pro if

  • You prefer Google DeepMind's tooling or already use it.

Choose GPT-5.1 Max if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.

FAQ

Is Gemini 3 Pro Pro better than GPT-5.1 Max?

On the index average, GPT-5.1 Max leads Gemini 3 Pro Pro by 0.6 points (87.9 versus 87.3). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Gemini 3 Pro Pro wins 7 benchmarks, GPT-5.1 Max wins 5.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Pro Pro or GPT-5.1 Max?

GPT-5.1 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $41.37 per million tokens, versus $42.00 for Gemini 3 Pro Pro.

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-5.1 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3 Pro Pro has 200,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Gemini 3 Pro Pro is proprietary; GPT-5.1 Max is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.1 Max for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons