Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Gemini 3 Pro Pro vs GPT-5.1 Pro: which model should you choose?

We compared Gemini 3 Pro Pro and GPT-5.1 Pro on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. GPT-5.1 Pro has the stronger average benchmark score; GPT-5.1 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Google DeepMind

Gemini 3 Pro Pro

Gemini 3 Pro Pro is a frontier model from Google DeepMind. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $19.80 per million input tokens and $108.61 per million output tokens, and averages 87.3 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.80 / 1M
Output
$108.61 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
87.3
Open weights
No
Full Gemini 3 Pro Pro page
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Pro

GPT-5.1 Pro is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $19.77 per million input tokens and $100.32 per million output tokens, and averages 87.8 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.77 / 1M
Output
$100.32 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
87.8
Open weights
No
Full GPT-5.1 Pro page

Specification comparison

SpecGemini 3 Pro ProGPT-5.1 ProEdge
Input price / 1M$19.80$19.77B
Output price / 1M$108.61$100.32B
Context window200,000200,000Tie
Max output8,19232,768B
Average score87.387.8B
Arena Elo1484.41490.0B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Gemini 3 Pro Pro wins 5, GPT-5.1 Pro wins 7, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGemini 3 Pro ProGPT-5.1 ProGapWinner
MMLU-Pro88.286.22.0Gemini 3 Pro Pro
GPQA Diamond81.483.42.0GPT-5.1 Pro
SWE-bench Verified75.780.14.4GPT-5.1 Pro
HumanEval95.091.13.9Gemini 3 Pro Pro
MATH-50091.695.13.5GPT-5.1 Pro
AIME 202588.090.62.6GPT-5.1 Pro
LiveCodeBench83.182.20.9Gemini 3 Pro Pro
IFEval92.794.82.1GPT-5.1 Pro
TruthfulQA87.686.90.7Gemini 3 Pro Pro
HellaSwag93.693.80.2GPT-5.1 Pro
MMMU83.281.61.6Gemini 3 Pro Pro
Arena Elo1484.41490.05.6GPT-5.1 Pro

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Gemini 3 Pro Pro costs about $42.00 per million tokens and GPT-5.1 Pro costs about $39.91. GPT-5.1 Pro is roughly 5% cheaper than Gemini 3 Pro Pro. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Both models list a 200,000-token context window. That is enough for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Gemini 3 Pro Pro wins 5, GPT-5.1 Pro wins 7, and 0 are tied. On the index average, GPT-5.1 Pro leads Gemini 3 Pro Pro by 0.5 points (87.8 versus 87.3).

The price picture favours GPT-5.1 Pro. The context picture is effectively a tie. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.1 Pro for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Choose Gemini 3 Pro Pro if

  • You prefer Google DeepMind's tooling or already use it.

Choose GPT-5.1 Pro if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 32,768-token output limit.

FAQ

Is Gemini 3 Pro Pro better than GPT-5.1 Pro?

On the index average, GPT-5.1 Pro leads Gemini 3 Pro Pro by 0.5 points (87.8 versus 87.3). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Gemini 3 Pro Pro wins 5 benchmarks, GPT-5.1 Pro wins 7.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Pro Pro or GPT-5.1 Pro?

GPT-5.1 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $39.91 per million tokens, versus $42.00 for Gemini 3 Pro Pro.

Which has the larger context window?

Both models list a 200,000-token context window.

Are these models open weights?

Gemini 3 Pro Pro is proprietary; GPT-5.1 Pro is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with GPT-5.1 Pro for quality-sensitive work, and check whether its price holds at your expected volume before committing.

Related comparisons