Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning vs o4 Max: which model should you choose?

We compared Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning and o4 Max on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning has the stronger average benchmark score; o4 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Google DeepMind

Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning

Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning is a frontier model from Google DeepMind. It offers a 200,000-token context window, costs $19.69 per million input tokens and $98.36 per million output tokens, and averages 87.5 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.69 / 1M
Output
$98.36 / 1M
Context
200,000
Avg score
87.5
Open weights
No
Full Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning page
OpenAI

o4 Max

o4 Max is a frontier model from OpenAI. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $19.51 per million input tokens and $93.98 per million output tokens, and averages 86.2 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.51 / 1M
Output
$93.98 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
86.2
Open weights
No
Full o4 Max page

Specification comparison

SpecGemini 3 Pro Reasoningo4 MaxEdge
Input price / 1M$19.69$19.51B
Output price / 1M$98.36$93.98B
Context window200,0002,000,000B
Max output8,19265,536B
Average score87.586.2A
Arena Elo1485.01486.0B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning wins 8, o4 Max wins 4, and 0 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGemini 3 Pro Reasoningo4 MaxGapWinner
MMLU-Pro90.186.33.8Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning
GPQA Diamond83.980.13.8Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning
SWE-bench Verified76.379.83.5o4 Max
HumanEval90.294.64.4o4 Max
MATH-50093.390.62.7Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning
AIME 202588.884.84.0Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning
LiveCodeBench82.080.61.4Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning
IFEval93.891.12.7Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning
TruthfulQA90.387.13.2Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning
HellaSwag93.591.71.8Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning
MMMU80.881.91.1o4 Max
Arena Elo1485.01486.01.0o4 Max

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning costs about $39.36 per million tokens and o4 Max costs about $38.13. o4 Max is roughly 3% cheaper than Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

o4 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 200,000 for Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning wins 8, o4 Max wins 4, and 0 are tied. On the index average, Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning leads o4 Max by 1.3 points (87.5 versus 86.2).

The price picture favours o4 Max. The context picture favours o4 Max. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning for quality-sensitive work and o4 Max for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.

Choose o4 Max if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.
  • You need the larger 65,536-token output limit.

FAQ

Is Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning better than o4 Max?

On the index average, Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning leads o4 Max by 1.3 points (87.5 versus 86.2). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning wins 8 benchmarks, o4 Max wins 4.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning or o4 Max?

o4 Max is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $38.13 per million tokens, versus $39.36 for Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning.

Which has the larger context window?

o4 Max has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning has 200,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning is proprietary; o4 Max is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Gemini 3 Pro Reasoning for quality-sensitive work and o4 Max for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons