Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Gemini 3 Pro vs Grok 4 Turbo: which model should you choose?

We compared Gemini 3 Pro and Grok 4 Turbo on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Grok 4 Turbo has the stronger average benchmark score; Gemini 3 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Google DeepMind

Gemini 3 Pro

Gemini 3 Pro is a frontier model from Google DeepMind. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $18.24 per million input tokens and $82.93 per million output tokens, and averages 86.1 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$18.24 / 1M
Output
$82.93 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
86.1
Open weights
No
Full Gemini 3 Pro page
xAI

Grok 4 Turbo

Grok 4 Turbo is a frontier model from xAI. It offers a 1,000,000-token context window, costs $19.21 per million input tokens and $87.37 per million output tokens, and averages 86.7 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$19.21 / 1M
Output
$87.37 / 1M
Context
1,000,000
Avg score
86.7
Open weights
No
Full Grok 4 Turbo page

Specification comparison

SpecGemini 3 ProGrok 4 TurboEdge
Input price / 1M$18.24$19.21A
Output price / 1M$82.93$87.37A
Context window2,000,0001,000,000A
Max output8,19265,536B
Average score86.186.7B
Arena Elo1460.71466.9B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Gemini 3 Pro wins 3, Grok 4 Turbo wins 8, and 1 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGrok 4 TurboGapWinner
MMLU-Pro88.286.12.1Gemini 3 Pro
GPQA Diamond79.084.55.5Grok 4 Turbo
SWE-bench Verified78.573.84.7Gemini 3 Pro
HumanEval91.892.91.1Grok 4 Turbo
MATH-50089.992.12.2Grok 4 Turbo
AIME 202584.385.20.9Grok 4 Turbo
LiveCodeBench83.384.71.4Grok 4 Turbo
IFEval93.791.12.6Gemini 3 Pro
TruthfulQA88.888.80.0Tie
HellaSwag91.392.51.2Grok 4 Turbo
MMMU78.681.73.1Grok 4 Turbo
Arena Elo1460.71466.96.2Grok 4 Turbo

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Gemini 3 Pro costs about $34.41 per million tokens and Grok 4 Turbo costs about $36.25. Gemini 3 Pro is roughly 5% cheaper than Grok 4 Turbo. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Gemini 3 Pro has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens, compared with 1,000,000 for Grok 4 Turbo. That matters for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Gemini 3 Pro wins 3, Grok 4 Turbo wins 8, and 1 are tied. On the index average, Grok 4 Turbo leads Gemini 3 Pro by 0.6 points (86.7 versus 86.1).

The price picture favours Gemini 3 Pro. The context picture favours Gemini 3 Pro. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Grok 4 Turbo for quality-sensitive work and Gemini 3 Pro for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose Gemini 3 Pro if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.
  • You need the larger 2,000,000-token context window.

Choose Grok 4 Turbo if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.
  • You need the larger 65,536-token output limit.

FAQ

Is Gemini 3 Pro better than Grok 4 Turbo?

On the index average, Grok 4 Turbo leads Gemini 3 Pro by 0.6 points (86.7 versus 86.1). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Gemini 3 Pro wins 3 benchmarks, Grok 4 Turbo wins 8.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Pro or Grok 4 Turbo?

Gemini 3 Pro is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $34.41 per million tokens, versus $36.25 for Grok 4 Turbo.

Which has the larger context window?

Gemini 3 Pro has the larger context window at 2,000,000 tokens. Grok 4 Turbo has 1,000,000 tokens.

Are these models open weights?

Gemini 3 Pro is proprietary; Grok 4 Turbo is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Grok 4 Turbo for quality-sensitive work and Gemini 3 Pro for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons