Head-to-head · frontier vs frontier

Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen3-Max Reasoning: which model should you choose?

We compared Gemini 3 Pro and Qwen3-Max Reasoning on price, context window and 12 benchmarks. Gemini 3 Pro has the stronger average benchmark score; Qwen3-Max Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis.

Google DeepMind

Gemini 3 Pro

Gemini 3 Pro is a frontier model from Google DeepMind. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $18.24 per million input tokens and $82.93 per million output tokens, and averages 86.1 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$18.24 / 1M
Output
$82.93 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
86.1
Open weights
No
Full Gemini 3 Pro page
Alibaba Cloud

Qwen3-Max Reasoning

Qwen3-Max Reasoning is a frontier model from Alibaba Cloud. It offers a 2,000,000-token context window, costs $18.12 per million input tokens and $81.94 per million output tokens, and averages 85.9 across the index's benchmark suite.

Input
$18.12 / 1M
Output
$81.94 / 1M
Context
2,000,000
Avg score
85.9
Open weights
No
Full Qwen3-Max Reasoning page

Specification comparison

SpecGemini 3 ProQwen3-Max ReasoningEdge
Input price / 1M$18.24$18.12B
Output price / 1M$82.93$81.94B
Context window2,000,0002,000,000Tie
Max output8,1928,192Tie
Average score86.185.9A
Arena Elo1460.71461.0B
Open weightsNoNoTie

Benchmark comparison

Gemini 3 Pro wins 5, Qwen3-Max Reasoning wins 6, and 1 benchmarks are tied. The table shows the modelled score for each model and the gap.

BenchmarkGemini 3 ProQwen3-Max ReasoningGapWinner
MMLU-Pro88.288.10.1Gemini 3 Pro
GPQA Diamond79.079.80.8Qwen3-Max Reasoning
SWE-bench Verified78.575.33.2Gemini 3 Pro
HumanEval91.892.60.8Qwen3-Max Reasoning
MATH-50089.993.03.1Qwen3-Max Reasoning
AIME 202584.383.11.2Gemini 3 Pro
LiveCodeBench83.378.05.3Gemini 3 Pro
IFEval93.792.21.5Gemini 3 Pro
TruthfulQA88.888.80.0Tie
HellaSwag91.391.50.2Qwen3-Max Reasoning
MMMU78.682.33.7Qwen3-Max Reasoning
Arena Elo1460.71461.00.3Qwen3-Max Reasoning

Price analysis

On a blended 3:1 input-to-output basis, Gemini 3 Pro costs about $34.41 per million tokens and Qwen3-Max Reasoning costs about $34.08. Qwen3-Max Reasoning is roughly 1% cheaper than Gemini 3 Pro. At high volume, that gap compounds quickly, so price should carry real weight unless the quality difference is decisive.

Both models list a 2,000,000-token context window. That is enough for long documents, large codebases and multi-step agent traces.

Verdict

Across 12 shared benchmarks, Gemini 3 Pro wins 5, Qwen3-Max Reasoning wins 6, and 1 are tied. On the index average, Gemini 3 Pro leads Qwen3-Max Reasoning by 0.2 points (86.1 versus 85.9).

The price picture favours Qwen3-Max Reasoning. The context picture is effectively a tie. Those two dimensions often matter more than a few benchmark points once a model is good enough for the task.

If you need a single default, start with Gemini 3 Pro for quality-sensitive work and Qwen3-Max Reasoning for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Choose Gemini 3 Pro if

  • You want the higher average benchmark score in this index.

Choose Qwen3-Max Reasoning if

  • Unit cost matters and you want the cheaper blended price.

FAQ

Is Gemini 3 Pro better than Qwen3-Max Reasoning?

On the index average, Gemini 3 Pro leads Qwen3-Max Reasoning by 0.2 points (86.1 versus 85.9). The better choice depends on price, context and your task. Gemini 3 Pro wins 5 benchmarks, Qwen3-Max Reasoning wins 6.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3-Max Reasoning?

Qwen3-Max Reasoning is cheaper on a blended 3:1 basis at about $34.08 per million tokens, versus $34.41 for Gemini 3 Pro.

Which has the larger context window?

Both models list a 2,000,000-token context window.

Are these models open weights?

Gemini 3 Pro is proprietary; Qwen3-Max Reasoning is proprietary.

Which should I choose for production?

If you need a single default, start with Gemini 3 Pro for quality-sensitive work and Qwen3-Max Reasoning for high-volume, well-scoped tasks. Run both on a sample of your own traffic before locking in a choice.

Related comparisons